JANUARY SURPRISE (cont"d)

[olualakemi]

So, is Barack the face-lift of amerika’s spearheading the new world odor’s endgame scenario? Here’s one view: ANY DOUBTS THAT OBAMA IS A PUPPET of Zbigniew Brzezinski and the Trilateral Commission ended when Brzezinski appeared on MSNBCs Morning Joe on March 21 2008 to campaign for Obama, wrote Rense.com political analyst Webster Tarpley Here. In his book Obama A Postmodern Coup Tarpley says that Brzezinski is seeking a global showdown with Russia and China - a far more dangerous venture than the Neocon/Bush Iraq fiasco. Tarpley observes that the Neocon/Bush era is over & is now replaced by the Brzezinski-Trilateral-Rockefeller phase of aggression. Tarpleys most recent remarks are quite revealing: “Obama’s first task as President will be to drive the Chinese out of Africa thus depriving them of oil and raw materials. Pakistan and other Chinese allies will be targeted for destruction. When Obama says bomb Pakistan and send more troops into Afghanistan he is expressing the Brzezinski strategy. Brzezinski will advise Obama to break up both Russia and China reducing both to petty states which would give Washington another century of world domination”.
On the other hand, some think Obama is another weak character like jimmy carter who will emasculate amerikan military power and allow us competitors like Russia and China to make power moves. For example:
“But there's another angle to this, based on what Biden the senator knows -- that Obama's defense policies, once it's obvious how they'll undermine us, are likely to be very, very unpopular. In this case, Biden may be calling on his party's hard, pacifist core -- Moveon.org, Code Pink and the like -- to stand by their man. He'll need their support. Like Jimmy Carter in the 1970s, Obama's policies often sound good on the surface, but will in fact materially weaken America's ability to defend herself. That's not just our opinion, mind you; it's straight from the horse's mouth. ‘I will cut tens of billions of dollars in wasteful spending," Obama told the pacifist Caucus for Priorities last year. "I will cut investments in unproven missile defense systems. I will not weaponize space. I will slow our development of future combat systems.’ “He will not weaponize space. That means that he will dismantle our missile defense shield ensuring that we won't be able to defend ourselves should a rogue leader or a terrorist organization shoot a nuclear weapon at us or at one of our allies”. Ed Morrissey expands on this and writes the following: ‘I think Biden wanted the Left to remain activist to support a retreat philosophy in the face of aggression from our enemies. Obama has consistently fronted that policy, in Iraq and elsewhere, both as a Senator and as a presidential candidate’.
Contrary to this view, Biden’s remarks can to seen to preparing, warning and conditioning Obama’s supporters to “have faith” and trust that whatever new round of warmongering goes down – while it may seem wrong at the get go, is actually all right for them to support. Consider this take:
“… (This) is Biden's usual haphazard and ill-advised way of saying, "Hey, thanks nutroots for supporting us and thanks for buying into the anti-war hooey we sold you. Like PT Barnum said, there's a sucker born every minute, and you're the best useful idiot suckers a party could have. But let's get real. Some stuff's gonna go down, probably involving the military and probably involving us doing something completely stupid like keeping our promise to invade an ally like nuclear-armed Paki-stahn* to get OBL without really knowing where he is. It'll really piss them off and they'll turn against us because they have no other choice. They'll side with the tribes and other anti-American factions inside Pakistan lest they fall out of power and the country into chaos. So we really hope you stick by us when even the NY Times, WaPo, LA Times and, heck, even The Nation will wonder just WTF they were thinking when they carried us on their backs into the White House. Oh, and did I mention will be pulling out combat troops from Iraq to achieve this? Man, you don't even want to know what's gonna happen in Iraq while we're dicking around chasing a ghost in Pakistan. 'But that's just one scenario'”.
The bottom line is that it seems something akin to the “October surprise” of 2008 (when an attempt was made to launch ww3 by using Georgia as a staging area for attacking iran while initiating a controlled demolition of the us economy prior to complete destruction of the dollar thus paving the way for the imposition of the amero and the north amerikkkan union) is definitely in the works, as the international socialist faction (comintern) of the luciferians (who have succeeded the national socialist or nazi faction under the republicans and the bushit dynasty) are getting ready. Consider this:
Army 'Strategic Shock' Report Says Troops May Be Needed To Quell U.S. Civil Unrest. "Purposeful domestic resistance" would require military to "rapidly determine the parameters defining the legitimate use of military force inside the United States." Steve Watson & Paul Watson Infowars.net Tuesday, Dec 16, 2008.
A recent report produced by the U.S. Army War College's Strategic Institute warns that the United States may experience massive civil unrest in the wake of a series of crises which it has termed "strategic shock." The report, titled Known Unknowns: Unconventional Strategic Shocks in Defense Strategy Development, also suggests that the military may have to be used to quell domestic disorder. "Widespread civil violence inside the United States would force the defense establishment to reorient priorities in extremis to defend basic domestic order and human security," the report, authored by [Ret.] Lt. Col. Nathan Freir, reads. "Deliberate employment of weapons of mass destruction or other catastrophic capabilities, unforeseen economic collapse, loss of functioning political and legal order, purposeful domestic resistance or insurgency, pervasive public health emergencies, and catastrophic natural and human disasters are all paths to disruptive domestic shock." it continues. "An American government and defen
se establishment lulled into complacency by a long-secure domestic order would be forced to rapidly divest some or most external security commitments in order to address rapidly expanding human insecurity at home..." "Already predisposed to defer to the primacy of civilian authorities in instances of domestic security and divest all but the most extreme demands in areas like civil support and consequence management, DoD might be forced by circumstances to put its broad resources at the disposal of civil authorities to contain and reverse violent threats to domestic tranquility. Under the most extreme circumstances, this might include use of military force against hostile groups inside the United States." Lt. Col. Freir concludes. See Pages 31-32 (PDF) for quoted sections.
Freir is a Senior Fellow in the International Security Program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). He joined the think tank in April 2008 after retiring from the U.S. Army after 20 years as a lieutenant colonel. In his role at CSIS he rubs shoulders with a whole host of globalist luminaries including Zbigniew Brzezinski, Henry Kissinger, Brent Scowcroft and Richard Armitage. Echoing recent comments made by Pentagon advisors, along with other notable figures such as Colin Powell and Joe Biden, Freir also warns that the incoming Obama administration should prepare for a "first term crisis" that could act as a catalyst for such unrest. "The current administration confronted a game-changing 'strategic shock' inside its first eight months in office," the report reads. "The next administration would be well-advised to expect the same during the course of its first term. Indeed, the odds are very high against any of the challenges routinely at the top of the traditional defense agenda triggering the next watershed inside DoD [Department of Defense]."
We have recently highlighted plans to station thousands more U.S. troops inside America for purposes of “domestic security” from September 2011, an expansion of Northcom’s militarization of the country in preparation for potential civil unrest following a total economic collapse or a mass terror attack. “The U.S. military expects to have 20,000 uniformed troops inside the United States by 2011 trained to help state and local officials respond to a nuclear terrorist attack or other domestic catastrophe, according to Pentagon officials,” reported the Washington Post last month.
In a September 8 Army Times article, Northcom announced that the first wave of the troop deployment, which was put in place on October 1st at Fort Stewart and at Peterson Air Force Base in Colorado Springs, would be aimed at tackling “civil unrest and crowd control”. After a controversy arose surrounding the admissions made in the Army Times article, Northcom retracted the claim but conceded that both lethal and non-lethal weaponry traditionally used in crowd control and riot situations would still be used in the field.
The increasing militarization of America is part of a long term agenda to abolish Constitutional rule and establish a "military form of government," following a large scale terror attack or similar disaster, as Tommy Franks, the former commander of the military’s Central Command, alluded to in a November 2003 Cigar Aficionado piece. Franks outlined the scenario by which martial law would be put in place, saying, “It means the potential of a weapon of mass destruction and a terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event somewhere in the Western world – it may be in the United States of America – that causes our population to question our own Constitution and to begin to militarize our country in order to avoid a repeat of another mass, casualty-producing event. Which in fact, then begins to unravel the fabric of our Constitution. Two steps, very, very important.” In the short term, the domestic deployment of troops is likely aimed at combating likely civil unrest that will ensue after a complete economic collapse followed by a devastating period of hyperinflation.
This warning was again echoed a few days ago in a leaked internal memo from Citibank. "The world is not going back to normal after the magnitude of what they have done. When the dust settles this will either work, and the money they have pushed into the system will feed through into an inflation shock," wrote Tom Fitzpatrick, Citibank’s chief technical strategist. The memo predicts "depression, civil disorder and possibly wars" as a fallout from an economic collapse that many say is on the horizon.
Naturally, the claim that such troop deployments are merely to aid in disaster relief efforts is a thin veil aimed at distracting from the real goal. Should a real tragedy occur, volunteers and already existing civil aid organizations are fully capable of dealing with such events, as we witnessed on 9/11. The military are primarily trained to kill people and break things, and their role during the Hurricane Katrina relief efforts was mainly focused on detaining people in sports stadiums, shooting alleged looters and seizing guns from wealthy home owners in the high and dry areas, while real recovery measures were left to volunteers and local state authorities.
The open admission that U.S. troops will be involved in law enforcement operations as well as potentially using non-lethal weapons against American citizens is a complete violation of the Posse Comitatus Act and the Insurrection Act, which substantially limit the powers of the federal government to use the military for law enforcement unless under precise and extreme circumstances. Section 1385 of the Posse Comitatus Act states, "Whoever, except in cases and under circumstances expressly authorized by the Constitution or Act of Congress, willfully uses any part of the Army or the Air Force as a posse comitatus or otherwise to execute the laws shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than two years, or both."
Under the John Warner Defense Authorization Act, signed by President Bush on October 17, 2006, the law was changed to state, "The President may employ the armed forces to restore public order in any State of the United States the President determines hinders the execution of laws or deprives people of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law or opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws." However, these changes were repealed in their entirety by HR 4986: National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2008, reverting back to the original state of the Insurrection Act of 1807. Despite this repeal, President Bush attached a signing statement saying that he did not feel bound by the repeal. It remains to be seen whether President elect Obama will reverse Bush's signing statement.
The original text of the Insurrection Act severely limits the power of the President to deploy troops within the United States. For troops to be deployed, a condition has to exist that, "(1) So hinders the execution of the laws of that State, and of the United States within the State, that any part or class of its people is deprived of a right, privilege, immunity, or protection named in the Constitution and secured by law, and the constituted authorities of that State are unable, fail, or refuse to protect that right, privilege, or immunity, or to give that protection; or (2) opposes or obstructs the execution of the laws of the United States or impedes the course of justice under those laws. In any situation covered by clause (1), the State shall be considered to have denied the equal protection of the laws secured by the Constitution."
Is the incoming Obama administration and Northcom waiting for such a scenario to unfold, an event that completely overwhelms state authorities, before unleashing the might of the U.S. Army against the American people? [Ret.] Lt. Col. Freir's Known Unknowns report addresses this specifically, stating: "A whole host of long-standing defense conventions would be severely tested. Under these conditions and at their most violent extreme, civilian authorities, on advice of the defense establishment, would need to rapidly determine the parameters defining the legitimate use of military force inside the United States. Further still, the whole concept of conflict termination and/or transition to the primacy of civilian security institutions would be uncharted ground. DoD is already challenged by stabilization abroad. Imagine the challenges associated with doing so on a massive scale at home."
The deployment of National Guard troops to aid law enforcement or for disaster relief purposes is legal under the authority of the governor of a state, but using active duty U.S. Army in law enforcement operations inside America absent the conditions described in the Insurrection Act is completely illegal. The political left and right need to join forces and denounce this plan for what it is - another unconstitutional step towards the incremental implementation of martial law and the militarization of America.
TO BE CONTINUED

[olualakemi]

“It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy". "Mark my words, mark my words,” Biden stressed, adding that “tough” and “unpopular” foreign policy decisions will have to be made. “I promise you it will occur,” Biden added, “As a student of history and having served with seven presidents, I guarantee you it is going to happen.” On the same day Biden made his prophesy, Colin Powell appeared on Meet The Press and stated “There’s going to be a crisis which will come along on the 21st, 22nd of January that we don’t even know about right now.”
Then there was this:- http://www.newsfocal.com/abuse-of-po...ional-crisis/: Pentagon Advisors Warn Of Coming International Crisis October 29th, 2008. The chairman of a key Pentagon advisory panel has echoed recent claims by both Joe Biden and Colin Powell, warning that the next administration will face an international crisis within months of taking office. Michael Bayer, chairman of the Defense Business Board and veteran Pentagon consultant announced during a public meeting late last week that the new President should “prepare for a likely first-270-days crisis.” Accordingly, the Defense Business Board says the new administration should set a goal to win Senate confirmation of key Pentagon posts in the first 30 days of the inauguration, in order to have a full team in place to deal with such a contingency, an Inside Defense report reveals. The incoming administration “must not wait until June” to get assistant secretaries confirmed and October for deputy assistant secretaries to be Senate confirmed, Bayer’s briefing (PDF) states.
Given that the Iranian revolution and the Bay of Pigs were both engineered by the CIA, and that the Gulf of Tonkin incident, the ‘93 WTC bombing and 9/11 have all been exposed as false flag events, one wonders whether the coming crisis will constitute more of the same. The latest warning of a “likely crisis” comes on the back of Joe Biden’s “guarantee” that an “international crisis” will unfold shortly after President Obama takes office. “It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama like they did John Kennedy,” Biden told an audience in Seattle earlier this month. “Remember I said it standing here if you don’t remember anything else I said. Watch, we’re gonna have an international crisis, a generated crisis, to test the mettle of this guy.” Biden continued. The assured tone with which Biden delivered his forecast was staggeringly convincing, and left the observer in no doubt that there will be a major world crisis shortly after Obama takes office.
IFA teaches that if 16 awo come together every 16 days and invoke ELA they can literally change reality working at the quantum level where past present and future happen NOW. experiments in the near east war zones by maharishi university demonstrate that a small number of people mediating on peace (feeling not thinking peace) had a measureble effect on the level of violence, crime and negative behavior in the area. a mambo in new orleans performed a public ritual to ogun to positively influence the level of crime there and the crim rate measurably dropped. the physicist rupert sheldrake described the "morphogenic effect" whereby all beings are connected by an energy field at the subatomic level such that the state and quality of ocnsciousness of a criticl mass of beings affects the entire set of such beings.
the number arrived at for such a critical mass is the square root of one percent. so in my humble view we need awos and orisa priests and vodunsi and all aware and conscious afrakans the hold the meditation and positive vibration for peace in our environment and for influx of light to cramp and paralyze all negativity that evildoers seek to impose on we the people. as we live in this land it makes sense for us to generate a critical mass of positive minds for the protection of our homes and families. where are the awos and other spiritual authorities including every aware and conscious afrakan who are ready and willing to join hands in collective prayer to surround our homes. families, communities, continent and planet with light enrgy and to neutralize all negative influx of the enemies of humanity and earth? please stand forth and act.