Communiversity

Afrikan Liberation Institute => Math and Science (STEM) => Topic started by: NyameNti on Jul 20, 2012, 05:17 PM

Title: Pharmaceutical Company.. Again!-gctid52746
Post by: NyameNti on Jul 20, 2012, 05:17 PM
My daughter just spent the week in a science program conducted by GlaxoSmith Kline (GSK).  GlaxoSmithKline's Science in the Summer is a free science  education program that helps school children "grow into science."  Through classes held in public libraries and other community-based  organizations, the program gets kids excited about learning science with  hands-on experiments. This is the promo from the website.
Nonetheless, while they are doing "well in the public relations" department.  They are still dealing drugs in the worst way..this is one of many settlements that GSK and many other drug dealers are involved in. If they do this here...what in the hell are they doing in Kmt were very little is done to protect people!

Department of Justice

 Office of Public Affairs
   FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
 Monday, July 2, 2012

GlaxoSmithKline to Plead Guilty and Pay $3 Billion  to Resolve Fraud Allegations and Failure to Report Safety Data
 Largest Health Care Fraud Settlement in U.S.  History

  Global health care giant  GlaxoSmithKline LLC (GSK) agreed to plead guilty and to pay $3 billion to  resolve its criminal and civil liability arising from the company's unlawful  promotion of certain prescription drugs, its failure to report certain safety  data, and its civil liability for alleged false price reporting practices, the  Justice Department announced today.   The  resolution is the largest health care fraud settlement in U.S. history and the  largest payment ever by a drug company.

GSK agreed to plead guilty to a  three-count criminal information, including two counts of introducing misbranded  drugs, Paxil and Wellbutrin, into interstate commerce and one count of failing  to report safety data about the drug Avandia to the Food and Drug Administration  (FDA).   Under the terms of the plea  agreement, GSK will pay a total of $1 billion, including a criminal fine of  $956,814,400 and forfeiture in the amount of $43,185,600.   The criminal plea agreement also includes  certain non-monetary compliance commitments and certifications by GSK's U.S.  president and board of directors.   GSK's  guilty plea and sentence is not final until accepted by the U.S. District Court.    
 
 GSK will also pay $2 billion to  resolve its civil liabilities with the federal government under the False Claims  Act, as well as the states.   The civil  settlement resolves claims relating to Paxil, Wellbutrin and Avandia, as well as  additional drugs, and also resolves pricing fraud allegations.

"Today's multi-billion dollar  settlement is unprecedented in both size and scope. It underscores the  Administration's firm commitment to protecting the American people and holding  accountable those who commit health care fraud," said James M. Cole, Deputy  Attorney General.   "At every level, we  are determined to stop practices that jeopardize patients' health, harm  taxpayers, and violate the public trust – and this historic action is a clear  warning to any company that chooses to break the law."



 Criminal Plea Agreement

 

 Under the provisions of the Food,  Drug and Cosmetic Act, a company in its application to the FDA must specify each  intended use of a drug.   After the FDA  approves the product as safe and effective for a specified use, a company's  promotional activities must be limited to the intended uses that FDA approved.    In fact, promotion by the manufacturer  for other uses – known as "off-label uses" – renders the product "misbranded."    
 
 Paxil:    In the criminal information, the government alleges that, from  April 1998 to August 2003, GSK unlawfully promoted Paxil for treating depression  in patients under age 18, even though the FDA has never approved it for  pediatric use.   The United States  alleges that, among other things, GSK participated in preparing, publishing and  distributing a misleading medical journal article that misreported that a  clinical trial of Paxil demonstrated efficacy in the treatment of depression in  patients under age 18, when the study failed to demonstrate efficacy.   At the same time, the United States alleges,  GSK did not make available data from two other studies in which Paxil also  failed to demonstrate efficacy in treating depression in patients under 18.    The United States further alleges that  GSK sponsored dinner programs, lunch programs, spa programs and similar  activities to promote the use of Paxil in children and adolescents.   GSK paid a speaker to talk to an audience of  doctors and paid for the meal or spa treatment for the doctors who attended.  Since 2004, Paxil, like other antidepressants, included on its label a "black  box warning" stating that antidepressants may increase the risk of suicidal  thinking and behavior in short-term studies in patients under age 18. GSK agreed  to plead guilty to misbranding Paxil in that its labeling was false and  misleading regarding the use of Paxil for patients under 18.

Wellbutrin:  The United States also alleges that, from  January 1999 to December 2003, GSK promoted Wellbutrin, approved at that time  only for Major Depressive Disorder, for weight loss, the treatment of sexual  dysfunction, substance addictions and Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder,  among other off-label uses. The United States contends that GSK paid millions of  dollars to doctors to speak at and attend meetings, sometimes at lavish resorts,  at which the off-label uses of Wellbutrin were routinely promoted and also used  sales representatives, sham advisory boards, and supposedly independent  Continuing Medical Education (CME) programs to promote Wllbutrin for these  unapproved uses. GSK has agreed to plead guilty to misbranding Wellbutrin in  that its labeling did not bear adequate directions for these off-label uses. For  the Paxil and Wellbutrin misbranding offenses, GSK has agreed to pay a criminal  fine and forfeiture of $757,387,200.

 

 Avandia:    The United States alleges that, between 2001  and 2007, GSK failed to include certain safety data about Avandia, a diabetes  drug, in reports to the FDA that are meant to allow the FDA to determine if a  drug continues to be safe for its approved indications and to spot drug safety  trends.   The missing information  included data regarding certain post-marketing studies, as well as data  regarding two studies undertaken in response to eureurasiaan regulators' concerns  about the cardiovascular safety of Avandia.    Since 2007, the FDA has added two black box warnings to the Avandia label  to alert physicians about the potential increased risk of (1) congestive heart  failure, and (2) myocardial infarction (heart attack).   GSK has agreed to plead guilty to failing to  report data to the FDA and has agreed to pay a criminal fine in the amount of  $242,612,800 for its unlawful conduct concerning Avandia.

"This case demonstrates our  continuing commitment to ensuring that the messages provided by drug  manufacturers to physicians and patients are true and accurate and that  decisions as to what drugs are prescribed to sick patients are based on best  medical judgments, not false and misleading claims or improper financial  inducements," said Carmen Ortiz, U.S. Attorney for the District of  Massachusetts.  
 
  "Patients rely on their  physicians to prescribe the drugs they need," said John Walsh, U.S. Attorney for  Colorado. "The pharmaceutical industries' drive for profits can distort the  information provided to physicians concerning drugs.  This case will help to  ensure that your physician will make prescribing decisions based on good science  and not on misinformation, money or favors provided by the pharmaceutical  industry."
 
 Civil Settlement Agreement

As part of this global  resolution, GSK has agreed to resolve its civil liability for the following  alleged conduct:   (1) promoting the  drugs Paxil, Wellbutrin, Advair, Lamictal and Zofran for off-label, non-covered  uses and paying kickbacks to physicians to prescribe those drugs as well as the  drugs Imitrex, Lotronex, Flovent and Valtrex; (2) making false and misleading  statements concerning the safety of Avandia; and (3) reporting false best prices  and underpaying rebates owed under the Medicaid Drug Rebate Program.

Off-Label Promotion and Kickbacks:  The civil settlement resolves claims set forth in a complaint filed by the  United States alleging that, in addition to promoting the drugs Paxil and  Wellbutrin for unapproved, non-covered uses, GSK also promoted its asthma drug,  Advair, for first-line therapy for mild asthma patients even though it was not  approvedor medically  appropriate under these circumstances. GSK also promoted Advair for chronic  obstructive pulmonary disease with misleading claims as to the relevant  treatment guidelines. The civil settlement also resolves allegations that GSK  promoted Lamictal, an anti-epileptic medication, for off-label, non-covered  psychiatric uses, neuropathic pain and pain management.   It further resolves allegations that GSK  promoted certain forms of Zofran, approved only for post-operative nausea, for  the treatment of morning sickness in pregnant women. It also includes  allegations that GSK paid kickbacks to health care professionals to induce them  to promote and prescribe these drugs as well as the drugs Imitrex, Lotronex,  Flovent and Valtrex.   The United States  alleges that this conduct caused false claims to be submitted to federal health  care programs.

GSK has agreed to  pay $1.043 billion relating to false claims arising from this alleged conduct.  The federal share of this settlement is $832 million and the state share is $210  million.

This off-label  civil settlement resolves four lawsuits pending in federal court in the District  of Massachusetts under the qui tam,  or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act, which allow private  citizens to bring civil actions on behalf of the United States and share in any  recovery.
 
 Avandia: In its civil settlement  agreement, the United States alleges that GSK promoted Avandia to physicians and  other health care providers with false and misleading representations about  Avandia's safety profile, causing false claims to be submitted to federal health  care programs. Specifically, the United States alleges that GSK stated that  Avandia had a positive cholesterol profile despite having no well-controlled  studies to support that message. The United States also alleges that the company  sponsored programs suggesting cardiovascular benefits from Avandia therapy  despite warnings on the FDA-approved label regarding cardiovascular risks.   GSK has agreed to pay $657 million relating  to false claims arising from misrepresentations about Avandia. The federal share  of this settlement is $508 million and the state share is $149 million.
 
 Price Reporting:  GSK is also resolving allegations that,  between 1994 and 2003, GSK and its corporate predecessors reported false drug  prices, which resulted in GSK's underpaying rebates owed under theMedicaid Drug Rebate Program. By  law, GSK was required to report the lowest, or "best" price that it charged its  customers and to pay quarterly rebates to the states based on those reported  prices. When drugs are sold to purchasers in contingent arrangements known as  "bundles," the discounts offered for the bundled drugs must be reallocated  across all products in the bundle proportionate to the dollar value of the units  sold. The United States alleges that GSK had bundled sales arrangements that  included steep discounts known as "nominal" pricing and yet failed to take such  contingent arrangements into account when calculating and reporting its best  prices to the Department of Health and Human Services. Had it done so, the  effective prices on certain drugs would have been different, and, in some  instances, triggered a new, lower best price than what GSK reported. As a  result, GSK underpaid rebates due to Medicaid and overcharged certain Public  Health Service entities for its drugs, the United States contends. GSK has  agreed to pay $300 million to resolve these allegations, including $160,972,069  to the federal government, $118,792,931 to thestates, and $20,235,000 to  certain Public Health Service entities who paid inflated prices for the drugs at  issue.

Except to the extent that GSK has  agreed to plead guilty to the three-count criminal information, the claims  settled by these agreements are allegations only, and there has been no  determination of liability.:whitedevil: