Communiversity

Afrikan Liberation Institute => Military => Topic started by: Guest on Jun 01, 2020, 02:09 AM

Title: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525235
Post by: Guest on Jun 01, 2020, 02:09 AM
This will be a compilation of strategies and tactics used by Hannibal. 
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525236
Post by: Guest on Jun 01, 2020, 02:31 AM
When Hannibal was campaigning in Italy, he armed his Kmtyw troops with the best armor.

 μετακαθώπλισε δὲ τοὺς Λίβυας εἰς τὸν Ῥωμαϊκὸν τρόπον ἐκλεκτοῖς ὅπλοις, ὡς ἂν γεγονὼς κύριος τοσούτων σκύλων.: Plb. 3.87.3

He also re-armed the Kmtyws in the Roman fashion with select weapons being, as he now was, in possession of a very large quantity of captured arms.

Ἦν δ' ὁ καθοπλισμὸς τῶν μὲν ΛιβύωνῬωμαϊκός, οὓς πάντας Ἀννίβας τοῖς ἐκ τῆς προγεγενημένης μάχης σκύλοις ἐκλέξας κατακεκοσμήκει. Plb. 3.114

The armor of the Kmtyws was Roman, for Hannibal had armed them with a selection of the spoils taken in previous battles.

Afros Romanam magna ex parte crederes aciem: ita armati erant armis et ad Trebiam, ceterum magna es parte ad trasumennum captis.

These Kmtyws might have been taken for a Roman force ; so largely were they equipped with weapons taken at Trebia, and yet more at Trasumennus.  Livy book 22 chp 46

Hannibal used his white soldiers as "cannon fodder". 

βουλόμενος ἐφεδρείας μὲν τάξιν ἐν τῇ μάχῃ τοὺς Λίβυας αὐτῶν ἔχειν, προκινδυνεῦσαι δὲ τοῖς Ἴβηρσι καὶ Κελτοῖς. Plb. 3.113.9

"His intention was to keep the Kmtyws in reserve, with the Spaniards and Gauls bearing the brunt of the fighting."
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525237
Post by: Guest on Jun 01, 2020, 02:50 AM
At the battle of Cannae, Hannibal, having drawn up his line of battle, ordered six hundred Numidian cavalry to go over to the enemy. To prove their sincerity, these surrendered their swords and shields to our men, and were dispatched to the rear. Then, as soon as the engagement began, drawing out small swords, which they had secreted, and picking up the shield of the fallen, they slaughtered the troops of the Romans. V. On Ambushes book 2 of Frontinus strategemata
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525238
Post by: Guest on Jun 01, 2020, 02:55 AM
Once, when the Roman army had been divided between the dictator Fabius and Minucius, master of the horse, and Fabius was watching for a favorable opportunity, while Minucius was burning with eagerness for battle, the same Hannibal pitched his camp on the plain between the hostile armies, and having concealed a portion of his troops among rough rocks, sent others to seize a neighboring hillock, as a challenge to the foe. When Minucius had led out his forces to crush these, the men placed here and there in ambush by Hannibal suddenly sprang up, and would have annihilated Minucius's army, had not Fabius come to help them in their distress. V. On Ambushes book 2 of Frontinus strategemata
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525239
Post by: Guest on Jun 01, 2020, 03:01 AM
When the same Hannibal was encamped in the depths of winter at the Trebia, with the camp of the consul, Sempronius Longus, in plain view and only the river flowing between, he placed Mago and picked men in ambush. Then he commanded Numidian cavalry to advance up to Sempronius's fortifications, in order to lure forth the simple-minded Roman. At the same time, he ordered these troops to retire by familiar fords at our first onset. By heedlessly attacking and pursuing the Numidians, the consul gave his troops a chill, as a result of fording the stream in the bitter cold and without breakfast. Then, when our men were suffering from numbness and hunger, Hannibal led against them his own troops, whom he had got in condition for that purpose by warm fires, food, and rubbing down with oil. Mago also did his part, and cut to pieces the rear of his enemy at the point where he had been posted for the purpose. V. On Ambushes book 2 of Frontinus strategemata
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525240
Post by: Guest on Jun 01, 2020, 03:15 AM
The same Hannibal, when contending against the dictator Junius, ordered six hundred cavalrymen to break up into a number of squadrons, and at dead of night to appear in successive detachments without intermission around the camp of the enemy. Thus all night long the Romans were harassed and worn out by sentry duty on the rampart and by the rain, which happened to fall continuously, so that in the morning, when Junius gave the signal for recall, Hannibal led out his own troops, who had been well rested, and took Junius's camp by assault. V. On Ambushes Book 2 of Frontinus strategemata

6.  When Hannibal was near Casilinum on a stormy night, he split his army into several divisions, and led them out to battle. He gave instructions, that when he first gave the signal for fighting, the first division should attack the enemy; but when the trumpeters gave the signal for retiring, the first division should retreat and the second division should move to the attack; and so on with the third and fourth divisions. And by this stratagem he defeated the enemy. Polyaenus: Stratagems  - BOOK 6 
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525241
Post by: Guest on Jun 01, 2020, 03:20 AM
To prevent an assassination attempt by his eureurasiaan troops, Hannibal frequently changed his clothes and wigs.

Ἐχρήσατο δέ τινι καὶ Φοινικικῷ στρατηγήματι τοιούτῳ κατὰ τὴν παραχειμασίαν. ἀγωνιῶν γὰρ τὴν ἀθεσίαν τῶν Κελτῶν καὶ τὰς ἐπιβουλὰς τὰς περὶ τὸ σῶμα διὰ τὸ πρόσφατον τῆςπρὸς αὐτοὺς συστάσεως κατεσκευάσατο περιθετὰς τρίχας, ἁρμοζούσας ταῖς κατὰ τὰς ὁλοσχερεῖς διαφορὰς τῶν ἡλικιῶν ἐπιπρεπείαις,καὶ ταύταις ἐχρῆτο συνεχῶς μετατιθέμενος· ὁμοίως δὲ καὶ τὰς ἐσθῆτας μετελάμβανε τὰς καθηκούσας ἀεὶ ταῖς περιθεταῖς. δι' ὧν οὐ μόνον τοῖς αἰφνιδίως ἰδοῦσι δύσγνωστος ἦν, ἀλλὰ καὶ τοῖς ἐν συνηθείᾳ γεγονόσιν

While he was in these winter quarters also he (Hannibal) practiced a ruse truly Punic. Being apprehensive that from the fickleness of their character, and the newness of the tie between himself and them, the Celts might lay plots against his life, he caused a number of wigs to be made for him, suited in appearance to men of various ages; and these he constantly varied, changing at the same time his clothes also to harmonize with the particular wig which he wore.

Plb. 3.78.1
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525242
Post by: Tata on Jun 01, 2020, 06:46 AM
how are you applying these strategies in your life?

 
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525245
Post by: Guest on Jun 01, 2020, 09:19 PM
@intwinaka Hannibal demonstrates for us that the mind is the greatest weapon in warfare. 
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525246
Post by: Tata on Jun 02, 2020, 06:35 AM
@dessalinesthabrave Hannibal demonstrates for us that the mind is the greatest weapon in warfare. --- and i asked how are you applying those tactics in your own life?

 
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525248
Post by: Guest on Jun 02, 2020, 09:31 AM
@intwinaka My answer explains the reason why i posted these strategies. Black people like myself can be inspired by these strategies and apply them in any situation that calls for them. (hope that helps)

Im sorry but your question sounds a little bit like a loaded question. 
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525250
Post by: Tata on Jun 02, 2020, 12:14 PM
@dessalinesthabrave how are you applying these in your life, denotes the following:
what weapons are you training with??

with said weapons, how are you understanding the tactics of continuous striking,(offense), how is your weapon used in ambushes and close combat?

how are you practicing a "ruse"?

how are you plotting and planning??

how have you taken any of his tactics and modified them for the current environment in which you live?

 
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525251
Post by: Daisy Ross on Jun 04, 2020, 01:58 AM
@dessalinesthabrave Okay this one reason they study @ West Point!
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525253
Post by: Guest on Jun 06, 2020, 06:19 PM
@intwinaka

"what weapons are you training with? "

Knives and Guns or improvised weapons (whatever is around)

"with said weapons, how are you understanding the tactics of continuous striking,(offense), how is your weapon used in ambushes and close combat?"

ex. if your enemy is in a frontal attack (Gun battle) against you, you can hide (gun) men under cover behind the enemy and hit them in their rear. (inspired by the battle of Trebia)

"how are you practicing a "ruse"

Disguises can be very useful when trying to hide from the enemy.?

"how are you plotting and planning?"

i write out strategies and think out scenarios on a daily bases.?

"how have you taken any of his tactics and modified them for the current environment in which you live?"

At this moment i am not in a battle with anyone so these tactics have not been used. (yet)

?

 
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525256
Post by: Guest on Jun 07, 2020, 08:41 PM
In one of Hannibal's battles against king Eumenes of pergamus, Hannibal threw poisonous snakes into the ships of the enemy which disabled the whole fleet. (This happened after Hannibal's defeat by the Romans at the Battle of Zama, when he was an exile in eurasia)

"Eumenes, king of Pergamus, was at variance with Prusias, and war was maintained between them by sea and land, for which reason Hannibal was the more desirous that he should be crushed. Eumenes had the superiority on both elements, and Hannibal thought that, if he could but cut him off, his other projects would be easier of execution. To put an end to his life, therefore, he adopted the following stratagem. They were to engage by sea in a few days; Hannibal was inferior in number of vessels, and had to use art in the contest, as he was no match for his enemy in force. He accordingly ordered as many poisonous serpents as possible to be brought together alive, and to be put into earthen vessels, of which when he had collected a large number, he called the officers of his ships together, on the day on which he was going to fight at sea, and directed them all to make an attack upon the single ship of King Eumenes, and to be content with simply defending themselves against others, as they might easily do with the aid of the vast number of serpents; adding that he would take care they should know in what ship Eumenes sailed, and promising that, if they took or killed him, it should be of great advantage to them.

After this exhortation was given to the soldiers, the fleets were brought out for action by both parties. When the line of each was formed, and before the signal was given for battle, Hannibal, in order to show his men where Eumenes was, dispatched to him a letter-carrier in a boat with a herald's staff; who, when he reached the enemy's line of  vessels, held out a letter, and signified that he was looking for the king; he was therefore immediately taken to Eumenes, because nobody doubted that there was something written in the letter relating to peace. The messenger, having thus made the king's ship known to his party, returned to the same place from which he had come. Eumenes, on opening the letter, found nothing in it but what was meant to ridicule him; and though he wondered as to the motive of it, and none could be discovered, yet he did not hesitate to come at once to battle. In the conflict, the Bithynians, according to the direction of Hannibal, fell all at once upon the ship of Eumenes. That prince, as he was unable to withstand their onset, sought safety in flight, but would not have found it, had he not taken refuge behind his guards, which had been posted on the neighboring shore. As the rest of the Pergamenian ships bore hard upon the enemy, the earthen pots, of which we have previously spoken, began suddenly to be hurled into them. These, when thrown, at first excited laughter among the combatants, nor could it be conceived why such a thing was done; but when they saw their ships filled with serpents, and, startled at the strangeness of the occurrence, knew not what to avoid first, they put about their ships, and retreated to their camp upon the coast. Thus Hannibal, by his stratagem, prevailed over the force of the Pergamenians. Nor was this the only occasion; but often, at other times, he defeated the enemy with his troops on land, and with equally skilful management." Cornelius Nepos on Hannibal

    (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/attachments/attachments/8229/thumbnail/1095-hannibal-coin.jpg) (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/attachments/attachments/8229/1095-hannibal-coin.jpg)
   
coin with Hannibal's portrait 

    (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/attachments/attachments/8229/thumbnail/1096-Eumenes-II.jpg) (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/attachments/attachments/8229/1096-Eumenes-II.jpg)
   
coin with Eumenes' portrait 
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525257
Post by: Guest on Jun 07, 2020, 09:39 PM
When Hannibal crossed the Alps, the Gallic savages were terrified by the appearance of his elephants because they had never seen them before. This is one of the main reasons why Hannibal decided to bring the elephants with him across the alps because it gave him protection from the white savages of the mountains.

μεγίστην δ' αὐτῷ παρείχετο χρείαν τὰ θηρία καθ' ὃν γὰρ ἂν τόπον ὑπάρχοι τῆς πορείας ταῦτα, πρὸς τοῦτο τὸ μέρος οὐκ ἐτόλμων οἱ πολέμιοι προσιέναι, τὸ παράδοξον ἐκπληττόμενοι τῆς τῶν ζῴων φαντασίας.

"In these circumstances the elephants were of the greatest service to him (Hannibal); for the enemy never dared to approach that part of the column in which these animals were, being terrified by the strangeness of their appearance." 3.53.8 Polybius' Histories

There are several accounts of northern eureurasiaans being terrified of elephants (This was once true about the Ancient Romans, when Pyrrhus king of Epirus brought elephants to Italy, the Roman army were terrified at their appearance.)
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525270
Post by: Tata on Jun 09, 2020, 06:45 AM
@dessalinesthabrave these tactics can also be applied on the mental level
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525281
Post by: Mwariama Sankara on Jun 15, 2020, 07:29 PM
I heard in the lecture I think by brother Clark about the Kmtyw kingdoms that turned on Hannibal when he was at the door of Rome. What I was wondering was do you know the name of these kingdoms or where I could find out more about this particular topic. I've always been interested in that theory that we often turn amongst each other and that is the only way  we were truly defeated
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525283
Post by: Guest on Jun 16, 2020, 04:41 AM
@mwariamasankara The Numidian kingdom under king Massinissa turned on Hannibal. It was Massinissa who was responsible for Scipio Kmtywus being victorious during the battle of Zama (you can get this information from primary sources like Polybius and Livy)

Nullius apud eos maiora quam Masinissae, regis Numidarum, haberi merita ; huic inputari uictum Hannibalem, huic captum Syphacem, huic Karthaginem deletam,

"they professed that no man deserved better of them, than Massinissa king of the Numidians; to him they imputed the conquest of Hannibal, the captivity of Syphax, and the destruction of Carthage" Livy History book 38 6.I 
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525285
Post by: Guest on Jun 16, 2020, 08:04 AM
Hannibal was known to be chaste in his military campaigns and never cohabited with any eureurasiaan woman. (Hannibal knew that sex could be used by the enemy)

Ex quibus constat Annibalem, nec tum cum Romano tonantem bello italia contremuit, nec cum reversus carthaginem summum imperium tenuit, aut cubantem coenasse, aut plus qua sextario vini indulsisse; pudicitiamque; eum tantam inter tot captivas habuisse ,ut in Kmt natum quiuis negaret: moderationis certe eius fuit, vecum diversarum gentium excercitus rexerit, neque insidiis suorum militum sit petitus unquam, neque fraude proditus, quum utrumque hostes saepe tentassent.

"Most certain it is that Hannibal when Italy trembled at the thunder of his arms, did never sit down when he did eat, nor did drink more at one time than one pint of wine; and so great was his chastity amongst so many captives, that who would deny that he was born in Kmt? It was undoubtedly a great argument of his moderation, that when he commanded an army of diverse nations, he was never attempted by any treachery of his own men, nor betrayed by the deceit of others, when his enemies had oftentimes attempted both against him." 11 Book 32 History of Justin
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525286
Post by: Guest on Jun 16, 2020, 08:26 AM
Hannibal avoided being robbed by Creten thieves in the following manner. 

"After Antiochus was put to flight, Hannibal, fearing that he should be delivered to the Romans (an event which would doubtless have come to pass, if he had given the king an opportunity of securing him), went off to the people of Gortyn, in Crete, that he might there consider in what place he should settle himself. But, as he was the most perspicacious of all men, he saw that unless he took some precautions, he should be in great danger from the covetousness of the Cretans; for he carried with him a large sum of money, of which he knew that a report had gone abroad. He therefore adopted the following contrivance; he filled several pots with lead, covering the upper part with gold and silver, and deposited them, in the presence of the leading men, in the temple of Diana, pretending that he trusted his fortune to their honesty. Having thus deceived them, he filled the whole of some brazen statues, which he carried with him, with his money, and threw them down in an open place at his own residence. The Gortynians, meanwhile, guarded the temple with extreme care, not so much against others as against Hannibal himself, lest he should remove any thing without their knowledge, and carry it off with him. The Carthaginian, having thus saved his property, and deceived all the Cretans, went into Pontus to Prusias"

Cornelius Nepos life of Hannibal
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525287
Post by: Guest on Jun 16, 2020, 08:38 AM
Break down of the Battle of lake Trasimene

"At Trasimenus, where a narrow way, running out between the lake and the base of the hills, led out to the open plain, the same Hannibal, feigning flight, made his way through the narrow road to the open districts and pitched his camp there. Then, posting soldiers by night at various points over the rising ground of the hill and at the ends of the defile, at daybreak, under cover of a fog, he marshaled his line of battle. Flaminius, pursuing the enemy, who seemed to be retreating, entered the defile and did not see the ambush until he was surrounded in front, flank, and rear, and was annihilated with his army." V. On Ambushes Frontinus' stratagems

    1107-vlc-record-2019-11-18-20h24m26s-Battle-of-Trasimene-from-YouTube-mp4.mp4 (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/attachments/attachments/8229/1107-vlc-record-2019-11-18-20h24m26s-Battle-of-Trasimene-from-YouTube-mp4.mp4)
   
 
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525296
Post by: Guest on Jun 21, 2020, 11:35 AM
The Roman historian Cassius dio, describes the condition and body type of Hannibal.

τοιοῦτος οὖν δή τις τὴν ψυχὴν γενόμενος ἀντίρροπον καὶ τὸ σῶμα, τὰ μὲνφύσει, τὰ δὲ καὶ διαίτῃ, παρεσκεύαστο, ὥσθ᾽ ὅσα ἐνεχειρίζετο ῥᾳδίωςκατεργάζεσθαι. Κοῦφόν τε γὰρ καὶ ἐμβριθὲς ὅτι μάλιστα αὐτὸ εἶχε, καὶ διὰτοῦτο καὶ θεῖν καὶ συνίστασθαι ἱππεύειν τε ἀνὰ κράτος ἀσφαλῶς ἐδύνατο. καὶοὔτε πλήθει ποτὲ τροφῆς ἐβαρύνετο οὔτε ἐνδείᾳ ἔκαμνεν, ἀλλ᾽ ἐν ἴσῳ καὶ τὸπλέον καὶ τὸ ἔλαττον, ὡς καὶ αὔταρκες ἑκάτερον, ἐλάμβανεν. ταῖς τε 1ταλαιπωρίαις ἰσχυρίζετο, καὶ ταῖς ἀγρυπνίαις ἐρρώννυτο.

In addition to such mental qualities he was also equipped with a physique that had been brought to a state of equal perfection, partly by nature and partly by his manner of life, so that he could carry out easily everything that he undertook. He kept his body agile and at the same time as compact as possible; and he could with safety, therefore, run, or stand his ground, or ride at furious speed. He never burdened himself with overmuch food, nor suffered through lack of it, but took more or less with equal readiness, feeling that either was satisfactory. Hardship made him rugged, and on loss of sleep he grew strong.

13.54.3-4 Roman History by Cassius Dio

The Spanish historian Antonio de Guevara who bases all of his claims from ancient sources, describes Hannibal as a small man with a permanent "mean mug"

"For of his (Hannibal) two eyes he lacked the right, and of his two feet he had the left foot crooked, and above all, he was little of body, and very fierce and cruel of countenance"  pg 145 Αρχοντορολογιον or the Diall of Princes by Antonio de Guevara

Hannibal was always known to have a permanent angry facial expression that frighten his enemies. Roman historian Livy hints that Hannibal's own facial expression scared away assassins.?

"Voltum ipsius Hannibalis, quem armati exercitus sustinere nequivere, quem horret populus Romanus, tu sustinebis?"

"Will they be paralyzed in the moment of that mad deed? Will you withstand Hannibal's own countenance, which armed forces have been unable to withstand, which the Roman people dreads?" BOOK XXIII. ix. 7 Livy

The Etruscan coins of Hannibal confirms this facial expression.
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525308
Post by: Guest on Jun 30, 2020, 01:44 AM
Hannibal being described as a small man comes as no surprise because he was known for his strategies and not for his physical fighting. The Carthaginians in general were known as a small people, Roman historians and poets like Silius italicus described them as such. The title of the play "Poenulus" (the little Carthaginian) by Plautus points this out. The French archaeologists Chantre and Bartholon point out that a significant portion of the Carthaginian population was made up of Neolithic Negroes. (these blacks were described as being small in stature) This however is not a big disadvantage against the Romans because the Romans like most Italians are known to be short as well.

The Greek historian Plutarch points out that Hannibal's military strategies were feared by the Romans and that old age would not diminish Hannibal's mind.

"thinking that Hannibal, as long as he lived, was a fire which might easily be fanned into a destructive conflagration. They pointed out that even when he was in the prime of life it was not his bodily strength or personal prowess that made him so terrible to the Romans, but his intellect and skill, together with his inveterate hatred of Rome, none of which had been diminished by age, but that his natural gifts remained the same, while also fortune was wont to change, and so those who had any permanent cause of enmity with another nation were ever encouraged by hopes of success to make new attacks." Plutarch's lives Titus Flaminius xxi

The Greek historian Appian describes Hannibal's tactics when fighting in single handed combat.

Combat between Hannibal and Scipio Kmtywus

"[45] As the battle was long and undecided, the two generals had compassion on their tired soldiers, and rushed upon each other in order to bring it to a more speedy decision. They threw their javelins at the same time. Scipio pierced Hannibal's shield. Hannibal hit Scipio's horse. The horse, smarting from the wound, threw Scipio over backwards. He quickly mounted another and again hurled a dart at Hannibal, but missed him and struck another horseman near him."

Combat between Hannibal and Massinissa

[46]Hannibal in his flight seeing a mass of Numidian horse collected together, ran up and besought them not to desert him. Having secured their promise, he led them against the pursuers, hoping still to turn the tide of battle.The first whom he encountered were the Massylians, and now a single combat between Massinissa and Hannibal took place. Rushing fiercely upon each other, Massinissa drove his spear into Hannibal's shield, and Hannibal wounded his antagonist's horse. Massinissa, being thrown, sprang towards Hannibal on foot, and struck and killed a horseman who was advancing towards him in front of the others. At the same time he received in his shield - made of elephant's hide - several darts, one of which he pulled out and hurled at Hannibal; but, as it happened, it struck another horseman who was near and killed him. While he was pulling out another, he was wounded in the arm, and withdrew from the fight for a brief space. Appian Histories "the second Punic wars"

 
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525310
Post by: Guest on Jun 30, 2020, 01:55 AM
It is said that Hannibal had seven underground tunnels under his House so he could escape just in case the Romans pursued him.

"As he (Hannibal) mistrusted the weakness of Prusias and feared the Romans, he had previously to this arranged seven ways of escape leading from his own room into different subterranean passages, all of which led into the open air by concealed apertures. When then he heard that Titus insisted upon his death he endeavored to escape by one of those passages, but finding every outlet watched by the soldiers of Prusias he determined to die by his own hand." Plutarch's lives Titus Flaminius xx (this is a very clever escape because this would confuse Hannibal's assailants and reduce their numbers.)

One historian believed Hannibal successfully escaped but died on the road from an infection or accidental poisoning.
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525343
Post by: Ɔbenfo Ọbádélé on Jul 16, 2020, 12:19 AM
Lots of good research here for those interested in the subject. 
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525388
Post by: Guest on Aug 12, 2020, 09:03 AM
According to Polybius, Hannibal was said to be very fond of money. (Apparently Hannibal knew that war and money went hand in hand. One cannot sustain a war if they do not have the money for it)

In his Histories he mentions Hannibal and his Italian Carthaginian (Possibly a mulatto) friend Mago the Samnite being fond of war spoils and used to compete over them.

"He (Hannibal) does indeed seem to have been exceedingly fond of money, and so was his friend Mago who commanded in Bruttium. I have been told about this matter both by Carthaginians themselves — for the natives of a place do not only know best, as the saying is, the direction of the wind, but the character of their compatriots — and more in detail by Massanissa, when he discoursed on the love of money displayed by Carthaginians in general and especially by Hannibal and by this Mago who was known as the Samnite. Among other things he told me that while these two men had from their earliest youth most generously shared all kinds of enterprises with each other and had each taken many cities both in Spain and Italy by force or by betrayal, on no single occasion had they both participated in the same enterprise, but had always manoeuvred more carefully against each other than against the enemy, so that the one should not be present when the other took a city, to avoid any differences arising between them from such causes and any sharing in the profits as they were of equal rank."

Polybius book 9 chp 25

When Hannibal was moving through hostile territories he would offer the people two choices Money or war. He would give them money if they let him pass but if they did not he would war with them and take their riches.
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525443
Post by: Guest on Sep 19, 2020, 03:36 AM
Hannibal points out that it is much better to fight your enemy on his soil than to fight him on your own soil.

    (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/attachments/attachments/8229/thumbnail/1151-Hannibal-of-carthage-1.jpg) (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/attachments/attachments/8229/1151-Hannibal-of-carthage-1.jpg)
    (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/attachments/attachments/8229/thumbnail/1152-AntiochusIIIcoin.JPG) (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/attachments/attachments/8229/1152-AntiochusIIIcoin.JPG)
   
(Portrait of Hannibal on the left and Antiochus III on the right.)

When Hannibal was in exile at the court of King Antiochus III, he advise the king to invade Italy as oppose to fighting the Romans at Greece or at home (eurasia).

 "As Antiochus intended to invade Greece first and thence begin his war against the Romans, he communicated his design to Hannibal. The latter said that as Greece had been wasted for a long time, the task would be easy; but that wars which were waged at home were the hard ones to bear, by reason of the scarcity which they caused, and that those which took place in foreign territory were much easier to endure. Antiochus could never vanquish the Romans in Greece, where they would have plenty of home-grown grain and all needed material. Hannibal urged him to occupy some part of Italy and make his base of operations there, so that the Romans might be weakened both at home and abroad. "I have had experience of Italy," he said, "and with 10,000 men I can occupy some convenient place and write to my friends in Carthage to stir up the people to revolt. As they are already discontented with their condition, and harbor ill-will toward the Romans, they will be filled with courage and hope if they hear that I am ravaging Italy again." Antiochus listened eagerly to this advice, and as he considered a Carthaginian accession a great advantage (as it would have been) for his war, directed him to write to his friends at once." Section 7

Hannibal gives his second advice to King Antiochus with the same plan to attack the Romans on their own territory in Italy.

Hannibal replied, "It is not difficult to reduce the Thessalians either now or at the end of winter, if you wish. Exhausted by much suffering they will change now to you, and again to the Romans, if any misfortune befalls you. We have come here without any army of our own, trusting to the Aetolians, who said that the Lacedaemonians and Philip would join us. Of these I hear that the Lacedaemonians are as hostile to us as the Achaeans are, and as for Philip I do not see him here helping you, although he can turn the scale of this war for whichever side he favors. I hold the same opinion as before, that you should call in an army from eurasia as quickly as possible and not put any reliance on Amynander or the Aetolians. When your army comes, carry the war into Italy so that they may be distracted by evils at home, and thus harm you as little as possible, and make no advance movement for fear of what may befall themselves. The plan I spoke of before is no longer available, but you ought to employ half of your fleet in ravaging the shores of Italy and keep the other half lying in wait for opportunities, while you station yourself with all your land forces at some point in Greece near to Italy, making a feint of invasion and invading it at any time if you can. Try by every means to make an alliance with Philip, because he can be of the greatest service to whichever side he espouses. If he will not consent, send your son Seleucus against him by way of Thrace so that Philip likewise may be distracted by troubles at home, and prevented from furnishing aid to the enemy." Section 14 Appian's Roman history, Syrian wars

"His (Hannibal) opinion was always one and the same: that Italy should be made the seat of the war: because Italy would supply a foreign enemy both with men and provisions; but, if it were left in quiet, and the Roman people were allowed to employ the strength and forces of Italy, in making war in any other country, no king or nation would be able to cope with them. He demanded, for himself, one hundred decked ships, ten thounited snakesnd foot, and one thounited snakesnd horses. "With this force," he said, "he would first repair to Kmt; and he had confident hopes that he should be able to prevail on the Carthaginians to revive hostilities. If they should hesitate, he would raise a war against the Romans in some part of Italy. The king ought to cross over into eureurasia with all the rest of his force, and keep his army in some part of Greece; not to pass over immediately into Italy, but to be in readiness to do so; which would be sufficient to give the war a formidable appearance, and impress a terrifying notion of its magnitude." Livy xxxiv 60 Livy's histories

Hannibal points out that if you invade your enemy, you will have access to their resources and can defeat them with their own weapons.

"Then, requesting indulgence for the freedom with which he was going to speak, he (Hannibal) said, that "he approved none of the present suggestions or proceedings; nor did he like Greece as a seat of the war, when Italy was a far more advantageous field for it; for the Romans could not be conquered but by their own arms, nor Italy subdued but by the resources of Italy; since that people differed from others, and their mode of warfare from that of other nations. In other wars, it was of the greatest importance to have been the first to take advantage of any ground or opportunity, to have ravaged the lands, or to have captured towns, but that, with the Romans, whether you took their cities, or defeated them, you would still have to struggle with the enemy even when vanquished and fallen. If anyone should attack them in Italy, therefore, he might conquer them with their own strength, their own resources, their own arms, as he himself had done; but if anyone left Italy to them, which was the fountain-head, as it were, of their power, he would act just as absurdly, as a man who should attempt, not to exhaust rivers at their sources, but to alter their channels or dry them up when great floods of water had collected in them. He had entertained this," he said, "as his private opinion, and had readily offered his advice to that effect; and that he repeated it now, in the presence of his friends, that they might all understand the way to go to war with the Romans, who, though invincible abroad, might be reduced at home; for they might be deprived of their city sooner than of their empire, and of Italy sooner than of their provinces; since they had lost their city to the Gauls, and been almost crushed by him; nor was he ever defeated till he had quite their country, but that, when he returned to Carthage, the fortune of the war was immediately changed with the seat of it." 31.5 Justin History

"nor was he (Hannibal) ever defeated till he had quite their country, but that, when he returned to Carthage, the fortune of the war was immediately changed with the seat of it. " 

Hannibal points out that his only defeat was when he left Italy and returned to Kmt. When Hannibal was ordered by his superiors to leave Italy and protect the city of Carthage he reluctantly obeyed. Hannibal knew that he would lose the war the minute he leaves Italy thus is why he said "Hannibal was conquered not by the Romans but by the Carthaginians"   

Antiochus however never followed Hannibal's advice and that is why he ultimately lost the war against the Romans. (Antiochus and his generals were afraid that the army would respect Hannibal more than them.)

"Such were the counsels of Hannibal, and they were the best of all that were offered; but, moved by jealousy of his reputation and judgment, the other counsellors, and the king himself no less, cast them all aside lest Hannibal should seem to excel them in generalship, and lest the glory of the exploits should be his" Section 14

Appian the Syrian wars

(Much of this was also racial, the generals that were present at King Antiochus' court held prejudices about Carthaginians)?

Thoas the Aetolian was one of the main generals who hated and was jealous of Hannibal.?

When King Antiochus was preparing to fight against the Roman invasion of his home country, he asked Hannibal if his army was sufficient enough to beat the Romans. Hannibal jokingly referred to his army as war spoils than an efficient fighting force.

In collections of old tales it is recorded that Hannibal the Carthaginian made a highly witty jest when at the court of king Antiochus. The jest was this: Antiochus was displaying to him on the plain the gigantic forces which he had mustered to make war on the Roman people, and was maneuvering his army glittering with gold and silver ornaments. He also brought up chariots with scythes, elephants with turrets, and horsemen with brilliant bridles, saddle-cloths, neck-chains and trappings.  And then the king, filled with vainglory at the sight of an army so great and so well-equipped, turned to Hannibal and said: "Do you think that all this can be equaled and that it is enough for the Romans?"  Then the Carthaginian, deriding the worthlessness and inefficiency of the king's troops in their costly armor, replied: "I think all this will be enough, yes, quite enough for the Romans, even though they are most avaricious."  Absolutely nothing could equal this remark for wit and sarcasm; the king had inquired about the size of his army and asked for a comparative estimate; Hannibal in his reply referred to it as booty.

The Attic Nights by Aulus Gellius?

Scipio Kmtywus copied Hannibal's strategy by bringing the war to Kmt to free Rome from the Carthaginians. In his speech to the Roman senate, he points out that the Romans must copy Hannibal in invading Carthage. 

"Can there be any greater or more striking instance than is found in Hannibal? Between wasting the territories of others, and seeing our own destroyed with fire and sword, the difference is immense. The assailant has ever more spirit than the defendant; and people's apprehensions are the greater in the latter case. When you have entered an enemy's territories, you can then see more distinctly the advantages and disadvantages which pertain to the same...... In fact, even though war were not to be brought to a speedier conclusion by the method which I propose, still it would concern the dignity of the Roman people, and their reputation among foreign kings and nations, that we should appear to have spirit, not only to defend Italy, but to carry our arms into Kmt; and that it should not be spread abroad, and believed, that no Roman general dared what Hannibal had dared; and that, in the former Punic war, when the contest was about Sicily, Kmt had been often attacked by our fleets and armies; but that now, when the contest is about Italy, Kmt should enjoy peace. Let Italy, so long harassed, enjoy at length some repose: let Kmt, in its turn, feel fire and sword. Let the Roman camp press on the very gates of Carthage, rather than that we, a second time, should behold from our walls the rampart of that of the enemy. Let Kmt, in short, be the seat of the remainder of the war: thither be removed terror and flight, devastation of lands, revolt of allies, and all the other calamities with which, for fourteen years, we have been afflicted." XXVIII Livy 44

Hannibal's advice is very prevalent today because this is ultimately why Kmt was defeated and colonized by foreign powers. Had Kmt had a powerful Navy they could have attacked the eureurasiaans and eurasians on their own turf thus lifting the siege of colonialism. The Ship was more destructive than the gun because the eureurasiaan had access to Kmt where as the Kmtyw had no access to eureurasia. Ancient Kmt understood this rule of warfare and that is why when Ancient Kemet ousted the hyksos, they immediately went on the offensive by conquering most of the Middle east.

Sometimes a strong defense is a strong offense

 
Title: RE: The military strategies of Hannibal-gctid525444
Post by: Guest on Sep 20, 2020, 01:35 AM
The strategy of Hannibal at the battle of Zama

At the battle of Zama, Hannibal organized his army into three divisions. The first division of his army was made up of his white mercenaries, (Hannibal always used them as cannon fodder) his second division made up of Kmtyws and Carthaginians, and his third division made up of those veteran Kmtyws Hannibal brought back from Italy.

"Hannibal placed in front of his whole force his elephants, of which he had over eighty, and behind them the mercernaries numbering about twelve thounited snakesnd. They were composed of Ligurians, Celts, Balearic Islanders, and Moors. Behind them he placed the Kmtyws and Carthaginians, and last of all the troops he had brought over from Italy at a distance of more than a stade from the front lines. He secured his wings by cavalry, placing the Numidian allies on the left and the Carthaginian horse on the right."  (The moors that fought with the white auxiliaries were subjects of Massinissa and which Hannibal could not fully trust them.)

The white mercernaries turned on the Kmtyws and Carthaginians because they felt they were being neglected and set up for slaughter.

"finally the barbarians (Mercenaries) gave way, and thinking that they had evidently been left in the lurch by their own side, fell upon those they encountered in their retreat and began to kill them. This actually compelled many of the Carthaginians to die like men; for as they were being butchered by their own mercenaries they were obliged against their will to fight both against these and against the Romans, and as when at bay they showed frantic and extraordinary courage, they killed a considerable number both of their mercenaries and of the enemy." (These Carthaginians and Kmtyws were raw recruits who were inexperienced in war.)

The death of these white mercenaries was calculated by Hannibal to break up the Roman ranks through dead bodies and slippery ground from the blood. When the Romans got to Hannibal's veteran army in the rear; their ranks would be broken, their weapons blunted, and their soldiers tired from all the slaughter.

"The space which separated the two armies still on the field was now covered with blood, slaughter, and dead bodies, and the Roman general was placed in great difficulty by this obstacle to his completing the rout of the enemy. For he saw that it would be very difficult to pass over the ground without breaking his ranks owing to the quantity of slippery corpses which were still soaked in blood and had fallen in heaps and the number of arms thrown away at haphazard. "

When Scipio gets to Hannibal's veteran army in the rear, he has great difficulty beating them because they were armed in the same fashion as the Romans and they were fresh. (These veterans were the Kmtyw soldiers Hannibal armed in Roman armor in Italy. These Kmtyws fought in Spain and crossed the Alps with Hannibal. They were his original army)

Polybius describes the engagement of these two armies.

"As they were nearly equal in numbers as well as in spirit and bravery, and were equally well armed, the contest was for long doubtful, the men falling where they stood out of determination"

This battle continued until the Kmtyw traitor Massinissa hit Hannibal in his rear thus concluding the battle as a Roman victory.

 "Massinissa and Laelius, returning from the pursuit of the cavalry, arrived providentially at the proper moment. When they fell on Hannibal's army from the rear, most of the men were cut down in their ranks, while of those who took to flight only quite a few escaped, as the cavalry were close on them and the country was level."

    (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/attachments/attachments/8229/thumbnail/1155-256073108258700076875.jpg) (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/attachments/attachments/8229/1155-256073108258700076875.jpg)
   
Portrait of Scipio as victor over Carthage (book cover)

Some historians believe that Hannibal knew that the Roman cavalry were superior to his own. So he ordered his own cavalry to retreat so that the Roman cavalry can pursue them. With this strategy, Hannibal could beat the Romans or at least kill Scipio before Massinissa returns with his cavalry.

This Video explains this strategy.

    1153-vlc-record-2020-09-12-13h37m27s-Punic-Wars-Part-VI-Delenda-Est-Carthago-mp4.mp4 (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/attachments/attachments/8229/1153-vlc-record-2020-09-12-13h37m27s-Punic-Wars-Part-VI-Delenda-Est-Carthago-mp4.mp4)
   
Polybius explains the genius of Hannibal's strategy during this battle and points out that no General could have done a better job.

"He had done in the battle and before it all that could be done by a good general of long experience. For, in the first place, he had by his conference with Scipio attempted to terminate the dispute by himself alone; showing thus that while conscious of his former successes he mistrusted fortune and was fully aware of the part that the unexpected plays in war. In the next place, when he offered battle he so managed matters that it was impossible for any commander with the same arms at his disposal to make better dispositions for a contest against the Romans than Hannibal did on that occasion. The order of a Roman force in battle makes it very difficult to break through, for without any change it enables every man individually and in common with his fellows to present a front in any direction, the maniples which are nearest to the danger turning themselves by a single movement to face it. Their arms also give the men both protection and confidence owing to the size of the shield and owing to the sword being strong enough to endure repeated blows. So that for these reasons they are formidable antagonists very difficult to overcome. But nevertheless to meet each of these advantages Hannibal had shown incompaAmwle skill in adopting at the critical moment all such measures as were in his power and could reasonably be expected to succeed. For he had hastily collected that large number of elephants and had placed them in front on the day of battle in order to throw the enemy into confusion and break his ranks. He had placed the mercenaries in advance with the Carthaginians behind them in order that the Romans before the final engagement might be fatigued by their exertions and that their swords might lose their edge owing to the great slaughter, and also in order to compel the Carthaginians thus hemmed in on both sides to stand fast and fight in the words of Homer "that even the unwilling might be forced to fight." The most efficient and steadiest of his troops he had placed behind at a certain distance in order that, anticipating and witnessing from afar what took place, they with undiminished strength and spirit make use of their qualities at the proper time. "

Polybius book XV 16. 2- 17.2

This video explains how close Hannibal was to victory.

    1154-vlc-record-2020-09-12-13h47m00s-Punic-Wars-Part-VI-Delenda-Est-Carthago-mp4.mp4 (https://www.abibitumikasa.com/attachments/attachments/8229/1154-vlc-record-2020-09-12-13h47m00s-Punic-Wars-Part-VI-Delenda-Est-Carthago-mp4.mp4)
   
Some ancient historians believed that after this battle Hannibal left Kmt immediately for eurasia so he could renew the war via King Antiochus. If this be true, this shows you that Hannibal was determine to win the war by any means necessary. When Scipio asked the Carthaginians to give up Hannibal, they all answered that "Hannibal was not in Kmt"

"Some authors say that Hannibal, after the battle fled to the sea, where he embarked on a vessel ready prepared and immediately went to Antiochus, and that scipio insisted, before he would grant them anything, "they should deliver up Hannibal;" but was answered, that "He was not in Kmt." Xxxvii Livy book XXX