Communiversity

Afrikan Liberation Institute => Politics and Law => Topic started by: Ɔbenfo Ọbádélé on Aug 08, 2008, 06:37 AM

Title: New Kmtyw Independence Movement-gctid30031
Post by: Ɔbenfo Ọbádélé on Aug 08, 2008, 06:37 AM
New Kmtyw Independence Movement

©Copyright Nov' 27ADM ®Registered Washitaw/PGRNA
 
 Registered Washitaw/PGRNA
 Khandi/i
 
Outline Thesis: Discussion of New Kmtyw Independence Movement Survival to spite united states governmental policy & CONstitutional Impacts
 
 I. Key terms
 
       A. New Kmtyw
 
       B. grants
 
       C. rescind
 
       D. informed choice
 
       E. viable options
 
       F. plebiscite  
 
 II. Author's note
 
 III. Content
 
       A. Definition of New Kmtyw
 
       B. declaration of war against Kmtyws
 
       C. brief analysis of colonial eureurasiaans founding fathers
 
       D. Three Viable options plus one
 
       E. Kmtyw nation builders  
 
 IV. Conclusion
 Khandi/ii
 Author's Note
 
All spellings of amerikkka, overstand vs. understand, "i" lower case, We in capital, u.s.a., eureurasiaan, white, in lowercase, Black in upper case and the like are purely intentional, as symbolic of the efforts of this author to purge from the psychopathology which is in opposition to the Kmtyw centered ethos of which this author subscribes.
 
             Survival of the New Kmtyw Independence Movement  
 
Thesis: Discussion of New Kmtyw Independence Movement Survival to Spite united states governmental policy & CONstitutional Impacts
 
New Kmtyws are defined as a people linked by common experience, being captured by invaders of the new world, sold into slavery, suffering dehumanizing treatment and were denied basic human rights. Being denied our history, cultures, tradition and languages, the common thread that binds community and family were broken. So We could not build alliances on the basis of being identified as Ashanti or Haunited snakes, Zulu, Yoruba or Mandinka. Thus, We find a New Kmtyw, with new common bonds: Independence. New Kmtyws set into full motion the revolutionary actions necessary to fight amerikkkans for our own independence. The New Kmtyw Independence Movement grew out of a desperate need to respond to governmental policy and CONstitutional laws of the united states.
 
 The written declaration of war against the New Kmtyw Independence Movement in the form of Article one, paragraph one, section 9 (titled the legislative articles/powers denied to congress), states, "...the migration of importation of such persons as any of the states now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the congress prior to the year one thounited snakesnd eight hundred and eight..." (Burns; 1989:22C) What this means in plain english is, the united states declares war on Kmtyws in Kmt as well as New Kmtyws. It also meant the slave trade would continue another 20 years and "...the full powers of the united states government would be used to protect all amerikkkans engaging in the trade." (Obadele; 1989:17) The united states, by law, supported war in Kmt against Kmtyws.
 
 In brief analysis of some of the eureurasiaan colonial founding father's writings, We find some very interesting text, relating to New Kmtyws. In the CONstitution for example, article 4, section 2, paragraph 3, interstate relations (in the portion some textbooks refer to as privileges & immunities), it states, "...no person held to service or labour in one state, under the laws thereof, escaping into another shall in consequence of any law or regulation therein, be discharged from such service or labour, but shall be delivered up on claim of the party to whom such service or labour may be due." (Burns; 1989: 22d) This article was certainly never for the benefit of New Kmtyws. For amerikkkans, article 4, section 2, paragraph 3 calls for no celebration of New Kmtyws who dared to seize independence by fighting for our freedom. For New Kmtyws, article 4, section 2, paragraph 3 represents a clear, unquestionable declaration of war which still stands today. The authors of various text books would have us think that the 13th amendment repeals this article. Such is not the case. Article 4, section 2, paragraph 3 is clearly defined in Imari Obadele's book titled, The New International Law Regime and united states Foreign Policy, where he states, "...article 4, section 2, paragraph 3 ... pledged the full force of the united states' state structure -- president, governors, courts, militia, army, navy, sheriffs -- to prevent the quest of freedom of the brave New Kmtyws and to return those to slavery who succeeded in winning their strikes for freedom." (Obadele; 1991:323) Clearly, the white founding fathers (policy makers) and their documents, they co-authored, were designed to have damaging affects on the New Kmtyw Independence Movement.
 
Further, more obstacles to the New Kmtyw Independence Movement include the 13th, 14th, & 15th amendments. Amendment 13 made a change in the law. New Kmtyws held as slaves were no longer slave or property. Slavery was dead but the 13th amendment was merely declamatory of the fact that New Kmtyws died with honors in the civil war for the rights of freedom.
 
 As for the 14th amendment, where it grants citizenship, it must be noted that, that which is granted can be rescinded. In fact, it is, at best an offer, not a grant. It is an option which We have and have never given up our rights to. The CONstitution assumes a conqueror's superiority when addressing New Kmtyws in legislation under the facade of offers and grants. Such is the case with the united states and Turtle Islander (native amer. indian) nations like the Cherokee, Creek, and Tuscarora in which the supreme kkkourt stated these nations and others were not completely independent but "domestic and dependent nations." (Obadele; 1991:323) Thus, these amendments (even if well intended, which is questionable) are in violation of New Kmtyws' rights. Freedom, citizenship, the vote, which the 13th, 14th, and 15th amendments attempt to address, are rights, not grants or offers or acts of legislation; rights of choice of New Kmtyws; rights demonstrated by plebiscite which has yet to occur. New Kmtyws have the right to informed choice to follow the Strategies of Struggle. Until We vote to either:
 
       1. build an Independent Nation State,
 
       2. Choose united states citizenship,
 
       3. go back to Kmt,
 
       4. go to some other country of our choosing (not Kmt or u.s.a.); live with independent Turtle Islander nations,
 
 any legislation constitutes an imposition of our right to self determination.
 
New Kmtyws must consciously and freely choose. The key element here is the right of free informed choice. It can not be emphasized enough that New Kmtyws had and still have four logical choices of political futures. Choices other than united states citizenship find New Kmtyws far less informed, since the other options still remain less palatable to white amerikkkans.
 
 Another example of the CONstitution assuming a conqueror's superiority stance is eloquently stated in Dr. Imari Obadele's book, Foundations of a Black Nation, "When the u.s. bought the Virgin Islands from Denmark... the u.s. never asked the Black Virgin Islanders... to express their views on future status. u.s. congress simply passed a law and made all Virgin Islanders u.s. citizens." (1975:22) This is yet another clear example of the denial of our rights to self-determination. For those who celebrate Kwanzaa, the New Kmtyw holiday created by Dr. Ron Karenga, you will relate to the principle of Kujichagulia (Self Determination). Defined, self determination means, man know thyself, determine for yourself who you are, and accept no one else's definition of you. Kujichagulia is one of the laws of the Nguzo Saba (Seven Principles) which govern conscious New Kmtyws' lives and the holiday of Kwanzaa.
 
 The New Kmtyw Independence Movement is not a new concept. Available to New Kmtyws were what i refer to as the Three Viable Options, plus One. These options were/are:
 
       1. return to Kmt,
 
       2. integrate into united states society,
 
       3. build an independent Nation State or
 
       plus one: escaped to Turtle Islander Nations.  
 
History records a few instances where enslaved/captured Kmtyws chose the option of returning to Kmt. Such instances of resistance to enslavement include the overtaking of the slave ship Little George in 1730, the overtaking of the slave ship the William in 1732 and the slave ship Creole in 1841. The Creole did not return to Kmtyw but rather to the Bahamas to establish themselves as free, independent and sovereign Kmtyws. In 1820, 88 New Kmtyws arrived on the west coast in the state of Liberia. Their return to Kmt, contributed to the building of Sierra Leone and Liberia. Hundreds of thounited snakesnds of New Kmtyws believed this to be the only way to uplift a degraded people. Among those who returned was David Coker, religious leader and schoolmaster of Baltimore. Others who returned to Kmt include John Russwurm, college grad, co-founder of the first New Kmtyw newspaper; Alexander Crummell, minister and scholar; Lott Carey, clergy, doctor, agriculturist; Ed W. Blyden, scholar; Henry Garnet; and Dr. Martin Delaney who was a physician.
 
 The next option of integration was chosen by such Kmtyws as Osborne Perry Anderson, who was a comrade of John Brown who led a force of white amerikkkans and New Kmtyws on a successful attack on Harper's Ferry (the united states arsenal) in Virginia in 1859. Anderson's hope was that their collective would become a state of the united states. Instead, John Brown and others were hung, Perry Anderson escaped and became a fugitive thereafter. Other integrationists include Richard Allen, Frederick Douglas (who knew of John Brown's plan to attack Harper's Ferry and was forced to flee to eureurasia for fear of united states prosecution of co-conspiracy), Harriet Tubman, David Walker, Henry Highland Garnet, Ida B. Wells and Sojourner Truth.
 
 The united states declared its independence in 1776. Its CONstitution went into effect in 1789. In 1800, on October 7th, a mere dozen years after the CONstitution was approved, General Gabriel Prosser and his secret army of over 1000 freedom fighters, armed with weapons and a careful, meticulous plan marched towards Richmond, Virginia. Fierce thunderstorms washed out roads and bridges, causing the revolt to be aborted. General Prosser and 22 others were hung when their plans were discovered. General Prosser's objective was not merely to abolish slavery but also to establish an independent nation state. His intentions are stated in his choice of target, the state capital. This objective makes clear that his was a movement and not an individual or small group attack, nor a blow in anger to kill evil slavemasters. Herein, Prophet Nat Turner deserves honorable mention for his revolt which killed 60 whites. Abolishment of slavery was his mission and less focused was he on New Kmtyw Nation building.
 
 As it relates to the Three Viable Options (or the Strategies of Struggle), General Prosser was in the good company of fellow nation builders like General Gracia. General Gracia established Gracia Real De Santa Teresa De Mose in 1739 to 1763. Then united states general andrew jackson uprooted and forced General Gracia southward; exercising the plus one option, General Gracia established the New Kmtyw-Turtle Islander Seminole state in 1836-1842 in Spanish Florida. General Gracia was later captured and murdered. Also, following in the footsteps of General Gabriel Prosser was General Denmark Vesey, in 1822, whose army numbered over 9,000. His elaborate plan centered on total secrecy and taking Charleston. Due to special preparations by amerikkkans, the attack was postponed. Rumors of revolt led to the arrests of Denmark, Peter Poyas and 4 others. They died silently. The army of over 9,000 was never discovered by the white amerikkkans.
 
 New Kmtyw freedom fighters all over the new world fought and built independent nation states from Zumbi of Palmares Republic in Brazil; to General Kojo, Accompong, Kofi, Johnny and Nana Acheampong (a female) in Jamaica; to Toussaint L'Overture in Haiti. Other nation builders include Marin Delaney who published various Black Nationalist newsletters; Rev. Tunis Campell, who built a New Kmtyw government on several islands including St. Catherine and Sapelo off the coast of Georgia with a 275 man defense force (u.s. army forced him to give up the islands); Henry Adams who appealed fruitlessly for land for his nation state in Louisiana; and finally, Edward McCabe who sought to make Oklahoma his national territory. Generals Prosser, Gracia, Vesey, Kojo and Rev. Campbell with all the above mentioned nation builders along with those whose names escape the history books, are prime examples of the support for and the practice of the viable option (strategic goal) of independent nation-statehood.
 
 The Plus One option, was not considered viable. Escape of New Kmtyws to Turtle Islander states was considered temporary. Though, temporary, many New Kmtyws resorted to finding safehaven in these communities. "The strategic goal of escaping to the Indians and joining them was pursued by New Kmtyws individually and in groups, but arguably, this goal never became a national strategic goal. It tended to be an expedient." (Obadele; 1991:329) Textbooks in amerikkka would have us think that New Kmtyws escaping to Turtle Islander nations was not necessary and that freedom fighters like Gabriel, Denmark, Tunis and others, mentioned and not mentioned, were not worthy of note. When these New Kmtyw heroes and sheroes are briefly commented upon, it is mostly in a unsuccessful or criminal context. But who are the real criminals? Are We to believe that washington, adams, hamilton, madison and jefferson along with such notables as roger sherman, robert livingston and ben franklin were lovers of freedom? Was their love of freedom merely a part of a feel good curriculum? Who were they really? Let's look at a few of these men from our Kmtyw centered perspective.
 
 The first draft of the declaration of independence of 1775 reveals a compromise on the part of jefferson resulting in the omission of the indictment against slavery. "thomas jefferson never had a white woman by his side after his white wife died in 1782 and for the next twenty years as he was ambassador to france, secretary of state, and president of the united states, jefferson only had a Black woman by his side" named "Sally Hemmings," as stated in the most capable words of Dr. Leonard Jefferies, (speech published in the Saturday, August 31, 27ADM [91] issue of the New York Amsterdam News Paper:32). None of the slaves of jefferson were ever freed by him nor were the children of Sally Hemmings nor Sally herself.
 
 It needs to be overstood that any New Kmtyw who opposed the lovers of freedom were taking a very principled stand. Benjamin Banneker for example, challenged thomas jefferson's beliefs of Kmtyw inferiority. Banneker accomplished what franklin could only take credit for. Banneker and franklin lived during the same time period and were acquaintances. Both were scientists and creators of almanacs. However, Banneker's almanac was so accurate that it is still the basis of almanacs of today, where franklin's is not. Banneker was an inventor and engineer. When Banneker City (washington dc) was in jeopardy of not being built because the frenchman who had the plans left taking them with him, Banneker, from memory, drafted the plans. Therefore, Benjamin Banneker represents more than ben franklin (at least in the hears and minds of conscious New Kmtyws).
 
The real criminals? Throughout history franklin has taken credit for the works of Banneker. But isn't that typical behavior of white amerikkka? Lewis Latimer's work was taken credit for, by thomas edison. Granville Wood's work was taken credit for by alexander graham bell. Woods was a New Kmtyw who is quoted in Dr. Jeffries's speech, taking the principled stand of "i'm not going to be bought off by a white man." (Jeffries; 1991:32) Woods and his brother established the Woods Electric Co. in Ohio. It also should be noted in the face of text book omissions, that Woods took edision to kkkourt twice for stealing his patents and Woods won the case. So, We have franklin and jefferson, for example, with other white criminals who were claiming freedom for themselves, while simultaneously trying to protect and preserve the system of slavery, cultural imperialism and oppression of Kmtyws globally.
 
 The New Kmtyw Independence Movement today is still being met with violent opposition just as in the days of Tunis, Gabriel, Denmark and others. Those seeking the option of building our own New Kmtyw independent nation state, like our New Kmtyw ancestors, still sit, today, in u.s. jails, dead, discredited, in exile or in the underground network. The fact is, neither the state of Mississippi CONstitution, for example, nor the u.s. federal government CONstitution provides any methods whereby New Kmtyws may exercise our right to build an independent nation, separating ourselves peacefully from the u.s. Congressman Fauntleroy and Conyers have forwarded legal documents on behalf of those seeking the option of an independent nation, placing proposals in the hands of richard nixon. With the exception of violent attacks against New Kmtyws doing nation building work around the country, the u.s. chooses to ignore any such proposals.
 
 So, in conclusion, the governmental policies and CONstitutional laws and legislation are merely tools to pacify New Kmtyws and lull us into a state of illusionary contentment. The 15th amendment grants the vote via the imposed citizenship of the 14th amendment. Yet, all attempts to organize a plebiscite by New Kmtyws to participate in an informed vote of self-determination, has been met with conspiracy, armed resistance and violence on behalf of the u.s. government and its various factions of its infrastructure. These amendments are mere pacifiers and like all pacifiers, they build gas and no nourishment will ever come from them. Therefore, the cons are amerikkka's persistence to cremate the New Kmtyw place of genius, persistence and resistance in history. The pros are the afterlife of New Kmtyws who continue to rise like the phoenix from the ashes, unwilling to die the death of historical cremation which amerikkka has prepared for us. From the rebellion on the first slave ships, to the present day efforts of New Kmtyws to BE a force in the struggle for independence; We will not merely shut up and disappear; We can not be bought off; We will not fear. If the "price of freedom is death," in the words of Malcolm X, then We will pay it with commitment and devotion through New Kmtyw Nation building: a viable alternative to racism, cultural imperialism and white supremacy in amerikkka. The New Kmtyw Independence movement in its present day form: Provisional Government Republic of New Kmt. PGRNA
 Country report Supplement
 
 3/10/28 ADM
 Country: Republic of New Kmt (RNA)
 
 Population: (based on the population of the five states in the Black Belt South, outlined as the national territory of RNA):
 
       6,194,077.45 total Black population
 
       21,391,663 total population
 
       Louisiana - 4,287,195 total population 1,320,456.06 (30.8%) Black population
 
       Mississippi - 2,614,294 total population 930,688.664 (35.6%) Black population
 
       Alabama - 4,135,543 total population 1,046,292.379 (25.3%) Black population
 
       Georgia - 6,751,404 total population 1,822,879.08 (27%) Black population
 
       S. Carolina - 3,603,277 total population 1,073,761.646 Black population  
 
Land Size (based on the land size of the five states in the Black Belt South, outlined as the national territory of the RNA): 229,260 total square miles
 
       Louisiana - 43,566 sq. mi.
 
       Alabama - 50,750 sq. mi.
 
       Mississippi - 46,914 sq. mi.
 
       Georgia - 57,919 sq. mi.
 
       S. Carolina - 30,111 sq. mi.
 
       Significant Natural Resources:
 
     Alabama - chief port in Mobile agriculture: peanuts, cotton, soybeans, cottonseed, catfish, hay, corn, wheat, potatoes, sweet potatoes, pecans, peaches live stock: cattle, hogs, pigs, poultry, catfish timber/lumber: pine, hard woods non-fuel minerals: stone, cement, clay, lime, sand and gravel commercial fishing principle industries: pulp, paper, electronics, chemicals, apparels, textiles, primary metals, lumber, wood products, food processing, fabricated metals, automotive tires, oil & gas exploration
 
      Georgia - chief ports: Savanna, Brunswick chief crops: peanuts, cotton, corn, tobacco, hay, soybeans timber/lumber: pine, hardwood livestock: poultry, cattle, hogs, pigs commercial fishing principle industries: services, manufacturing, government, retail trade, textiles, foods, kindred products
 
      Louisiana - chief ports: Baton Rouge, New Orleans, Lake Charles, S. Louisiana Port Commission at LaPlate, Shreasport principle industries/goods: wholesale/retail trade, transportation, mining, chemical products, foods, transportation equipment, electronic equipment, petroleum, lumber, wood, paper agriculture: soy beans, sugar cane, rice, corn, cotton, sweet potatoes, pecans surahgum livestock: cattle, hogs, pigs, sheep, poultry timber/lumber: pine, hardwood, oak natural minerals: salt, sand, gravel, sulfur commercial fishing oil (off shore & under the ground)
 
      Mississippi - Pascagoula, Vicksburg, Gulf Port, Natchez, Greenville principle industries/goods: manufacturing, government, wholesale/retail trade, apparels, food, kindred products, furniture, lumber, wood products, electrical machinery, transportation products/chief crops: cotton, catfish, rice, soybeans livestock: cattle, hogs, pigs, broilers timber/lumber: pine, oak, hardwoods non-fuel minerals: construction sand, gravel, commercial fishing oil
 
      South Carolina - Charleston, Georgetown, Port Royal principle industries/goods: tourism, agriculture, manufacturing, textiles, chemicals, allied products, machinery, fabricated products, metals, apparels chief crops: tobacco, soy beans, corn, cotton, peaches, hay livestock: cattle, hogs, pigs, chickens, (excluding broilers)] timber/lumber: pine, oak non-fuel minerals: crushed stone, cement, clay commercial fishing  
 
 Economics/GNP/P.C.I. - diversified; no immediate use for these in the present provisional state
 
 National/Ethnic/Tribal Groups (%'s): Kmtyw descendants, Turtle Islanders (native amer. indians)
 
 Religious Groups (%'s): Kmtyw traditionalists and other beliefs
 
 Marriage system: both polygamous and monogamous
 
 Languages: KiSwahili (national language), english, and others
 
 History:
 
       1. Ancient Civilizations: Songhai, Timbuktu, Khemet, Ethiopia, Inca Aztec
 
     2. Major conflicts/wars (in 20th century): Cointel-Pro (fbi/cia's counter intelligence programs waged against Kmtyw and New Kmtyw nationalist/PanKmtywist/integrationist structures
 
      3. Independence: initial declaration October 7, 1800 by General Gabriel Prosser and New Kmtyw army of more than 1,000 in Richmond, Va. Contemporary declaration: 1968, Detroit, Michigan, New Kmtyws meet to establish a written document of their Declaration of Independence, establishing the Provisional Government of the Republic of New Kmt  
 
 Human Rights Assessments: Rating/Source: non-applicable
 
 Political Rights: All Kmtyws born in amerikkka have the right as stated in the Code of Umoja (RNA Constitution)
 
Voting Rights: All Kmtyws born in amerikkka have the right to vote as stated in the Code of Umoja (also the National Black Elections texts)
 
Criminal (Right of Accused): All New Kmtyw citizens presently held in amerikkkan kkkoncentration kkkamps prisons) should be given POW/political prisoner status and then set free (refer to POW mailing list)
 
 Economic/Property Rights: All New Kmtyw citizens have the rights as sighted in the Code of Umoja
 
 International/Regional Security/Trade Groups:
 
       Libya: assist in RNA sovereignty and statehood
 
       Cuba: same as Libya (give asylum to our military in exile)
 
       Turtle Islanders: exchange assistance of our independence with theirs
 
       Sources: The Libya Papers Turtle Islander Treaty Papers Cuban Alliance Papers  
 
 Type of Government (Formal Structure):
 
       Constitutional - Code of Umoja
 
       Parliamentary - PCC (People's Senate Council representatives elected by the citizens), have a vote in the PCC
 
     Ministries - not elected by popular vote, appointed by the head representative (President), approved by the PCC, have no vote in the PCC
 
       non-party system  
 
 No cracies, isms, or other terms apply
 
Current issue (political controversy or event) that is (or was recently) associated with the RNA: Kmtyw Independence in the Diaspora (especially in the united states) What the political issue/controversy is about: Fundamental reason oppression of Kmtyws born in amerikkka continues, is because We lack the power to control our lives; the way to gain that power and end oppression is to build a sovereign New Kmtyw nation (wage parliamentary war) Source: New Kmtyw Creed Primary goals in the issue: is to gain power, end our oppression, build state (military power, government, inter into relations with other states)
 
 Opposition to the objectives of the RNA: amerikkka wishes to continue to control, retain power, oppress and continue relations which affect Kmtyw lives
 
 Initiatives for implementation of the Prime Minister/Chief Executive of the RNA: use the resources of Kmtyws - brains, labor, natural resources, limited objective, domestic support, foreign support, inherent military viability, with second strike capability (ref. Eight Strategic Elements)
 
 What policy should u.s.a. president clinton and/or secretary of state initiate: support all reparations bills submitted to congress on behalf of the RNA (ref. Conyers HR40 Bill) and open negotiations with elected representatives of RNA to begin peaceful relations; encourage and support RNA plebiscite.
 
 mailto:khandipages@yahoo.com
 
 Official Provisional Government Republic of New Kmt site
 
 Next Article PanKmtywism