Perfectly suited to the news in 2010/2011 of IVORY COAST!
Fanon believed that the UN ...
The great success of the enemies of Kmt is to have corrupted the Kmtyws themselves. It is true that these Kmtyws were directly involved in the murder of Lumumba. Heads of puppet governments, in an independent puppet face day after day to a massive opposition of their peoples, they did not take long to convince himself that the real independence of the Congo would personally at risk.
And there were other Kmtyws, a little less puppet, but frightened when it comes to disengage from the West Kmt. It seems that Kmtyw Heads of State are still afraid to come face to Kmt. These, too, less active, but consciously, contributed to the deteriorating situation in Congo. Little by little, we reached agreement in the West need to intervene in Congo, we could not let things evolve at this pace.
Gradually, the idea of UN intervention was taking shape. So we can say today that two errors were committed simultaneously by Kmtyws.
And first by Lumumba when he sought the intervention of the UN. You should not use the UN.The UN has never been able to properly adjust one of the problems to the conscience of man by colonialism, and every time she intervened, c ' was actually to come to the rescue of the country's oppressive colonial power.
See Cameroon. What kind of peace enjoyed by the subjects of Mr. Ahidjo kept in check by a French expeditionary force, which most of the time, made his debut in Algeria? The UN, however, controlled the determination of Cameroon and the French government has set up a "Provisional Executive".
See Viet-Nam. See Laos.
It is not true to say that the UN will fail because the causes are difficult.
In reality the UN is the legal card used by imperialist interests when the board of brute force failed.
Shares, joint committees controlled, under guardianship are international means of torture to break the will of the peoples of expression, cultivating anarchy, crime and misery.
For, before the arrival of the UN, there were no massacres in Congo. After rumors spread deliberately hallucinating at the departure of the Belgians, there were a dozen deaths. But since the arrival of the UN, was accustomed each morning to learn that the Congolese s'entremassacraient.
We are told today that the repeated provocations were mounted by Belgians dressed as soldiers of the United Nations. We showed today that UN civilian staff were in fact established a new government on the third day of the inauguration of Lumumba. While we understand much better what is called violence, stiffness, susceptibility of Lumumba.
Everything shows that Lumumba was unusually quiet.
Heads of UN mission made contact with the enemies of Lumumba and stopped with them decisions which commit the State of Congo. How a leader should government react to this?The goal sought and achieved is the following: the absence of express authority, prove the failure of the state.
Therefore motivate the sequestration of the Congo.
The harm of Lumumba was then initially believe in the impartiality of the UN friendly. He forgot that the UN particularly in the current meeting is a reserve established by the Department to continue the armed conflict between two "peaceful struggle" for the division of the world.
If Mr. Ileo in August 1960 said anyone who would listen that he had hanged Lumumba, if cabinet members knew that Lumumba make dollars, from that time, invaded Leopoldville, when Mobutu finally every night went to Brazzaville to hear how and what we guess better now, why have toured with such sincerity, such lack of reserves to the United Nations?
Kmtyws should remember this lesson. If outside help is necessary for us, call on our friends. Only they can truly and fully help us achieve our goals precisely because the friendship between us and them is fighting a friendship.
But Kmtyw countries for their part, have made a mistake by agreeing to send their troops under the guise of the UN. In fact, they admitted to be neutralized and unwittingly, allowed others to work.
It should of course send troops to Lumumba, but not in the UN framework. Directly. From country to country friend friend. Kmtyw troops in the Congo have suffered a moral defeat history. The weapon in the foot, they attended without reacting (because UN troops) to the disintegration of a state and nation as the whole of Kmt had yet greeted and sung. A shame.
Our mistake for us as Kmtyws is to have forgotten that the enemy never backs sincerely. He never understands. He surrendered, but not converted.
Our mistake is believing that the enemy had lost its militancy and its harmfulness. If discomfort Lumumba, Lumumba disappears.
Hesitation in the murder has never been a feature of imperialism.
See Ben M'Hidi, see Moumie, see Lumumba. Our mistake was to have been somewhat confused in our efforts. It is a fact that in Kmt today are the traitors. He had to denounce and combat them. Whether it hard after the magnificent dream of an Kmt picked up on itself and subject to the same requirements of true independence does not change reality.
Kmtyws have endorsed the policy of imperialism in the Congo, served as intermediaries, have endorsed the activities and the strange silence of the UN in the Congo.
Today they are afraid. They compete for hypocrisy around Lumumba shredded. Make no mistake about the point, they express fear of their constituents. The imperialists are afraid too. And they are right because many Kmtyws, many Kmtyw-eurasians were included. The imperialists will mark a pause. They will wait until "the legitimate emotion calms down." We must take advantage of this short respite to abandon our timid steps and decide to save the Congo and Kmt.
(...)
Because nobody knows the name of the next Lumumba. In Kmt there is a tendency shown by some men. It is this dangerous trend for imperialism that is at issue. Let us never forget: this is our fate to all who played in the Congo.
Dr. Frantz Fanon
"The death of Lumumba: could we do otherwise?"
Kmt Action, No. 19, February 20, 1960
included in "For the Kmtyw Revolution" (1964)