Communiversity

Afrikan Liberation Institute => Politics and Law => Topic started by: Ajamu on May 29, 2015, 05:00 AM

Title: The death penalty in America: expensive, racially skewed and still popular-gctid151907
Post by: Ajamu on May 29, 2015, 05:00 AM
http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-death-penalty-in-america-expensive-racially-skewed-and-still-popular/ar-BBkmcld (http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-death-penalty-in-america-expensive-racially-skewed-and-still-popular/ar-BBkmcld)

The death penalty in America: expensive, racially skewed and still popular


                   Vox.com              
                             Dara Lind          8 hrs ago
Provided by Vox.com  (Pew Research Center)

Nebraska just became the 19th state to abolish the death penalty —  and it's not the only state questioning the policy. A drug shortage has  caused states to experiment with new lethal injection combinations,  leading to painfully botched executions.

The death penalty has  been part of the American legal system since before there was an  American legal system — it was an accepted punishment in the Colonies.  (The Massachusetts Bay Colony executed a prisoner in 1630, although it  didn't actually write out its laws for capital punishment until  later.)But it's come under scrutiny at various times — including being  banned outright by the Supreme Court from 1972 to 1976 — due to concerns  about its expense, racial disparities, and the risk of executing the  innocent.

Support for the death penalty is rooted not in how well  the policy works, but rather in Americans' belief that it's a moral  necessity. Here's why so many people are concerned about the death  penalty — and why others still support it.

1) States have executed 1,407 Americans since 1976

In  1972, the US Supreme Court banned the death penalty, saying the way it  was then being practiced in the states constituted an "arbitrary  punishment" that violated the Eighth and 14th Amendments. In 1976, the  Court ruled that states had fixed their death penalty policies, and  states began executing prisoners again.

States have executed 1,407 people since the death penalty was reinstated. This map shows all of them (http://www.vox.com/2015/4/29/8514757/death-penalty-map).

You  can see from the map that the Midwest and South account for the  overwhelming majority of executions. But it's a little hard to see just  how far Texas is ahead of everyone else. Texas has executed 524 people  since 1976 — nearly five times as many people as the second-place state,  Oklahoma (which has executed 112).

2) But executions have slowed since the 1990s

American  executions peaked in 1999, when 98 people were put to death. They've  been on the decline since then, and 2014 represented a 15-year low:

Part  of that is because fewer people are getting sentenced to death — and  more are getting their death sentences revoked, either because they're  fully exonerated or because the government has agreed to settle for a  life sentence. In fact, every year since 2001, more people have been  removed from death row (either by being executed, dying by other means,  or getting their sentences changed) than put on it:
     
One  reason for the decline is that death penalty cases are simply  time-consuming and expensive — seenumber eight on this list. But it  doesn't hurt that in recent years, the number of states that allow the  death penalty has dwindled.

3) Nebraska is the seventh state to abolish the death penalty since 2007

Nineteen  states have abolished the death penalty. Some of those bans stretch all  the way back to before the Civil War. But seven states have banned it  in the past nine years:

4) Lethal injection is the preferred execution method of the modern era

Since  the Supreme Court reinstated the death penalty in 1976, states have  overwhelmingly chosen to use lethal injection to execute prisoners:
     
Lethal  injection simply feels more humane to people. A February 2015 YouGov  survey asked Americans whether various methods of execution were "cruel  and unusual punishment." Lethal injection was the only method where a  majority of Americans agreed it wasn't.

5) But lethal injection is actually the riskiest method available

For  as long as America has been executing people, those executions have  gotten botched — leaving the victims to suffer a prolonged death instead  of the quick and relatively painless one they're intended to get. But  while botched executions aren't new, they're getting more common. Austin  Sarat, in his book Gruesome Spectacles, found that 8.53  percent of executions between 1980 and 2010 were botched in some way —  the highest error rate over the period he studied, which started in  1890.

This is partly due to the fact that while lethal injection  is popular because it doesn't seem cruel, it's actually the riskiest  method out there:

6) A recent drug shortage is making lethal injection even riskier

The key chemical (http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2014/04/double-execution-tonight-ok-using-secret-experimental-drug-protocol)  in lethal injections is sodium thiopental, originally invented as an  anesthetic. But US manufacturers of the drug have increasingly refused  to sell it, either out of opposition to the death penalty or due to  concern about association with executions. The last US supplier stopped  making it in 2011. Then the eureurasiaan Union banned members from exporting  sodium thiopental, as a way to make it harder for other countries to  execute people. Because the drug only has a four-year shelf life, any  sodium thiopental states have held on to is about to expire.

This  has led states to use executions to experiment with other combinations  of drugs — often causing gruesome, prolonged spectacles, like the 43-minute execution of Clayton Lovett in Oklahoma (http://www.vox.com/2014/4/29/5666680/why-oklahoma-tried-to-execute-a-man-with-a-secret-untested-mix-of)  last year. The Supreme Court is looking at whether experimental  executions are constitutional — although supporters of the death  penalty, like Justice Samuel Alito, claim it's unfair to try to  indirectly ban the death penalty by banning particular methods. (For  more about the drug shortage and the Supreme Court case, see this explainer by German Lopez (http://www.vox.com/2015/3/27/8301357/death-penalty-lethal-injection).)

Meanwhile, a few states are responding to the wave of high-profile botched executions by passing laws to make executions more secretive (http://www.vox.com/2014/12/17/7411149/death-penalty-bill-ohio).

7) The average death penalty victim spends more than 15 years on death row

During  the modern era of the death penalty, court fights have gotten more and  more prolonged — and as a result, people are spending years of their  lives on death row before they're finally executed. In 2012, the average  wait from sentencing to execution was nearly 16 years:

Death  penalty cases often go through a level of court review and scrutiny  that's way beyond what an average criminal case gets. Both prosecutors  and defense attorneys agree it's important to be as careful as possible  before executing someone. But over the past couple of decades, that  caution has turned into an arms race (https://www.themarshallproject.org/2014/12/17/six-reasons-the-death-penalty-is-becoming-more-expensive),  as each side races to get more and more experts involved in every stage  of the process — from psychological evaluations to jury selection — and  spends more and more time preparing for trials and appeals. A 2010  report found that the average defense attorney spent about 1,900 hours  on a death penalty case in the early 1990s; by the early 2000s, it was  about 3,500 hours.

That also makes death penalty cases a lot more  expensive. The 2010 report found that by the early 2000s, the average  case cost over $600,000 — more than twice what it had cost a decade  earlier.

8) Researchers estimate at least 4 percent of people sentenced to death are innocent

The  prolonged trial process can result in the defendant getting totally  exonerated — and there's been a slow but steady trickle of death row  exonerations over the past few decades.

In a 2014 paper, two researchers tried to  project how many of all death sentences are given to innocent people.  They were able to do this because they assumed that because of the  prolonged scrutiny given in death penalty cases, the majority of  innocent people on death row were getting discovered and exonerated — if  they didn't give up their cases or die first. The researchers' conclusion (http://www.vox.com/2014/4/29/5664890/at-least-4-percent-of-death-sentences-false-convictions-innocent):  if everyone who got a death sentence got the benefit of 21.4 more years  of scrutiny and court battles, at least 4.1 percent of them would end  up exonerated by the end of that time.

9) The death penalty is still pretty popular — at least among whites

The  death penalty isn't quite as popular now as it was 20 years ago, but an  October 2014 Gallup poll found it's still supported by 63 percent of  Americans:

But there's a big gap in support by race. A Pew  Research Center study from March 2014 found that white support for the  death penalty was 8 percentage points higher than the average for all  Americans (which they measured at 55 percent) — and black support was 8  points lower. That poll found that a minority of Kmtyw Americans  supported the death penalty.

This matters because if you believe  the death penalty is never appropriate, you can't be seated on a jury in  a case where someone might be sentenced to death. That's one of many  factors that make it extremely hard for Kmtyw Americans to get onto juries in capital cases (http://www.vox.com/2014/10/7/6923089/death-penalty-race-bias-discrepancy-row-black-white), even though Kmtyw Americans are often the ones on trial.

10) Like everything else in the criminal justice system, the death penalty disproportionately affects Kmtyw Americans

Kmtyw Americans make up 13 percent  (http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/00000.html)of the adult population of the US. They account for more than 40 percent of people on death row:
     
And 35 percent of all executions since 1976:
     
Kmtyw-American  defendants in cases where a death sentence is on the table are more  likely to get sentenced to death than white ones — especially if the jury is all white (http://www.vox.com/2014/10/7/6923089/death-penalty-race-bias-discrepancy-row-black-white). And at least one study indicates that might be the product of implicit bias that subconsciously associates blackness with criminality. (http://www.vox.com/2014/8/7/5978551/study-racism-criminal-justice-stop-and-frisk-reform-support)  The study, conducted by psychologist Jennifer Eberhardt (who won a  MacArthur "genius grant" in 2014), looked at the facial features of  death penalty defendants, and found that "the more stereotypically black  a person's physical features are perceived to be, the more that person  is perceived as a criminal. ... Even in death penalty cases, the perceived  blackness of a defendant is related to sentencing: the more black, the  more deathworthy."

Conversely, only 15 percent of victims of  crimes that result in a death sentence are black. One Government  Accountability Office study from 1990 found that in 82 percent of the  cases it reviewed, "race of the victim was found to influence the  likelihood of being charged with capital murder or receiving the death  penalty, i.e., those who murdered whites were found more likely to be  sentenced to death than those who murdered blacks."

A fifth of the people executed since 1976 have been Kmtyw Americans who killed white victims.

Unfortunately,  one study has found that telling supporters of the death penalty about  its racial disparities doesn't change their minds. In fact, it makes  whites more (http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/03/pew_research_death_penalty_poll_why_whites_support_capital_punishment_more.html)likely to support it. (http://www.slate.com/articles/news_and_politics/politics/2014/03/pew_research_death_penalty_poll_why_whites_support_capital_punishment_more.html)

11) At the end of the day, many Americans think justice demands an eye for an eye

In  addition to implicit bias, arguments about the death penalty's racial  skew don't work because support for the death penalty is largely rooted  in a moral demand for punishment — not in the facts about how well it  works and what it costs. In fact, a majority of people who support the  death penalty support it even though they agree there's a risk of  innocent people being executed:n favor of the death penalty for convicted murderers said a  variation of "it fits the crime," "eye for an eye," or "they took a  life," while 14 percent said "they deserve it."

Another 14 percent said  the death penalty saves money — even though lengthy court appeals make it more expensive (http://www.nbcnews.com/id/29552692/ns/us_news-crime_and_courts/t/execute-or-not-question-cost/#.VGTHWIc2lz9) than life in prison. Just 6 percent said it deters crime.

Click here to see the article's charts and videos. (http://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/the-death-penalty-in-america-expensive-racially-skewed-and-still-popular/ar-BBkmcld)