Is the online surveillance of black teenagers the new stop-and-frisk?-gctid159977

[Ajamu]

http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2015/apr/23/online-surveillance-black-teenagers-new-stop-and-frisk

Is the online surveillance of black teenagers the new stop-and-frisk?       Critics say the NYPD's trawling of social media for gang activity –  affecting children as young as 10 – is disproportionate and may amount  to racial profiling

Rose Hackman

   Thursday 23 April 2015 08.00 EDT

Taylonn Murphy is sitting in a Harlem beauty salon after hours.  Leaning back in his chair and with a calm demeanor, he is talking about  keeping young local people out of harm's way.

Every now and then though, as he speaks, his voice breaks.

In September 2011, his daughter Tayshana, 18, a local basketball  superstar and resident of West Harlem's Grant Houses, was shot dead by  two residents of Manhattanville Houses. The killing was described as the  result of a rivalry between the two housing projects that dates back  decades.

Almost three years after his daughter's death, on 4 June 2014,  helicopters hovered overhead as the first rays of sunlight hit the  concrete. At least 400 New York police officers in military gear raided both housing projects, with indictments for the arrest of 103 people.

The Guardian is counting the people killed by US law  enforcement agencies this year. Read their stories and contribute to our  ongoing, crowdsourced project

Starting in January 2010, the community's children and young  adults had been closely watched by police officers – both online and  off. The investigation had involved listening in to 40,000 calls from  correctional facilities, watching hours of surveillance video, and  reviewing over 1m online social media pages.

For Murphy, the revelation of these details was choking: the NYPD had been attentively surveilling both communities for over one and a half years before his daughter was murdered, patiently waiting and observing as the rivalry between crew members escalated.

Online surveillance: the new stop-and-frisk?



 In 2013, stop-and-frisk was found unconstitutional by a federal judge  for its use of racial profiling. Since then, logged instances have  dropped from an astonishing 685,000 in 2011 to just 46,000 in 2014. But  celebrations may be premature, with local policing increasingly moving  off the streets and migrating online.

In 2012, the NYPD declared a war on gangs across the city with Operation Crew Cut.  The linchpin of the operation's activities is the sweeping online  surveillance of individuals as young as 10 years old deemed to be  members of crews and gangs.

This move is being criticized by an increasing number of community  members and legal scholars, who see it as an insidious way of justifying  the monitoring of young men and boys of color in low-income  communities.

These days, crews are understood geographically ("turf-based").  They're no longer "entrepreneurial" – that is, heavily within the  organized crime world, like LA gangs were in the 1990s. In other words,  New York City crew membership, which mostly appeals to teenagers, is  simply related to the block you grew up on, your community and family  ties, and perhaps even your interest in partying, dance or graffiti.

Mostly,  being a member of a gang or a crew is a fleeting moment of adolescence,  and something that people grow out of, explains Jeffrey Lane, a  professor in communication at Rutgers University whose research has  looked at the way in which adolescent street life is lived online.

What is unquestionably worrying – and what the NYPD is using to  justify broad monitoring of large swaths of people – is when these crews  turn on each other, and rivalries between crews become violent, or even  deadly. And while some of the humiliation and potential violence is  avoided by diverting resources away from the physical practice of  stop-and-frisk, online surveillance raises a vast series of questions  tied to the civil liberties of young men of color.

A life watched online
Aaron De La Rosa, 24, a soft-spoken lifelong Harlem resident who  holds two jobs – one in construction and one in the restaurant industry –  says he doesn't get stopped and frisked nearly as much any more.

There was a time, just a couple of years ago, when he says if he was  in a group of five friends or more, they couldn't make it to the end of a  single block without being stopped by police.

De La Rosa says he knows to never post anything related to guns or  drugs on Facebook or anywhere else online, even in jest. He is aware, he  alleges, that the NYPD is watching him and his friends. He has warned  his friends that jokingly posting anything even vaguely incriminating  online is dangerous (eg "I wanted to strangle that annoying person on  the subway!").

"But some don't listen. They're stubborn," De La Rosa says, worried.

De  La Rosa's worries are not misplaced. In 2013, Babe Howell, a law  professor at CUNY, obtained documents revealing 28,000 New Yorkers were  named on a centralized internal NYPD gang list. The list appears to be  an open secret among prosecutors and police department workers, and the  bars of entry are unclear.

The NYPD juvenile justice division's "youth crew list" was last  leaked to the press in 2012, just before the official launch of  Operation Crew Cut. At the time of its release, the list already  contained the names of over 300 crews across the city – the most  conservative estimate would therefore bring online surveillance to  include thounited snakesnds of youth.

The crews are surveilled offline, but also on Facebook, Twitter,  Instagram, YouTube and other social media channels. When accounts are  set to "private", police officers sometimes gain access to them by  sending friend requests posing as young women or club promoters.

As of yet, people added to the gang list are neither notified, nor  are they therefore given the possibility of being removed from it. They  stay on it for life.

There appears to be no age limitation within the NYPD's online social  media protocol: adult officers seeking to watch alleged crew members as  young as 10 by posing as young people are able to do so. There also  appears to be no official provision requiring parents or guardians to be  notified either.

Bearing direct witness to this widespread online monitoring are the  indictments of gang and crew members from the last few years. According  to a study by Jeffrey Lane and Fanny Ramirez at Rutgers University, 48%  of evidence used in seven separate gang indictments between February  2011 and June 2014 in Harlem related to online social media activity  collected through police online surveillance.

Crucially, while crews appear to be referred to as crews  when their names are collected for NYPD list purposes, when their  members appear on criminal indictments, they graduate to being referred  to as gang members. This has heavy consequences in practical  and legal terms: bails often skyrocket to impossible levels, and members  can be charged as co-conspirators in cases involving, at worst, murders  they had no knowledge of and no direct involvement in.

Is racial profiling still at play?
For Dennis Parker, the director of ACLU's Racial Justice Program, the  fact that members seem to overwhelmingly be black and brown youth point  to potential racial profiling questions.

"The key to legal policing practices is that you need to proceed on  the base of individualized suspicion of criminal activity and that any  blanket suspicion on people, either because of where they live or  because of their race or ethnicity, is a potential violation of the  constitution," Parker says. "There are ways that you can assure safety  in communities, without throwing out these huge nets which capture so  many people who are innocent."

Would a white group of middle-class young men assembled in a college  fraternity and stereotyped as being likely to commit sexual assault of  women be included on such a list? Current available evidence suggests  they would not.

In Harlem, police-community ties have been so compromised by decades  of bad relations that residents often do not feel they can call on the  police when a crime happens.

De La Rosa, who remembers crying the first time he was arrested when  he was 12, says the people he fears the most in the neighborhood by far  are police officers, not fellow residents. Even with stop-and-frisk  encounters far less frequent, comfort levels are still low. "You can't  even go and hang out in the park with your friends when it's nice  weather. Unless you're playing baseball, they think you're up to no  good," he says.

According  to Jeffrey Lane, the Rutgers professor who embedded himself in Harlem  street life as part of an urban ethnography, police practices sometimes  include picking up young crew members on one block, putting them in the  back of a police car, questioning them, and then dropping them off,  knowingly, in the middle of rival crew territory.

Tayshana's father, Taylonn Murphy, agrees law enforcement actions do  not appear overly concerned with intra-community relations and peace.  Despite the fact that two young men were given sentences of 25 years to  life for the murder of his daughter in September 2011 (that is, before the raids took place), the case was effectively reopened with the raids.

"What kind of position are you putting my family in that you are  locking up 100 kids using my daughter as a premise?" Murphy says,  explaining he did not want more arrests, but funding for programs so the  community could heal.

"I am lucky people in the community know me and have seen me do  good," Murphy says, referring in part to the reconciliation efforts he  has been undertaking across rival crew territories, including with the  mother of one of the men convicted in his daughter's murder. "Otherwise,  this would have put me in danger."

Police proudly point to the fact that there have been no shootings  related to the gang rivalry since the raids, something Murphy and his  fellow community mobilizer, Derrick Haynes, say is due to the cold  weather and a temporary vacuum. "Nothing has been solved," Murphy says.  "You created a void, and you haven't filled it up with anything."

Safer now?
Andrew Laufer, a defense attorney in New York City, says he has seen a  recent uptick in arrests on mass conspiracy charges made off the back  of online social media activity. "They arrest a number of teenagers on a  number of serious crimes. Some of them are potentially guilty of them,  but most aren't," says Laufer, who has represented individuals who were  later acquitted in such cases.

Laufer calls the technique both a "roundup" that zooms in on  low-income minority communities and a "numbers game", alluding to the  fact that the police department may be looking to make arrests to meet  high quotas of fines or arrests.

Mike Loudwy, a South Harlem resident, does not feel any less targeted  than he used to. This, despite the fact that illegal activity in Harlem  is nowhere near what his older peers tell him it once was. "Drugs are  sold out. No one is selling. The game is much safer now. So of course  they [the police] are going to find something new to go after," he says.  "The only reason they were raiding that thing [the Grant and  Manhattanville houses] is because they can't catch nobody no more."

CUNY law professor Babe Howell backs this point up. "Violent crime  has declined 80% in the last two decades. Law enforcement doesn't have  much to do. So they're creating a world in which we are fearful of  gangs, and then creating accomplice liability, so that there will be one  shooting but we will hold 50 kids accountable for it."

But when Operation Crew Cut was launched in 2012, the justification  for it was that while crime had gone down, it had not gone down in  specific pockets of the city, where crews and gangs were running  rampant.

While not completely exonerating, actual data may suggest a more  complex, less alarming story. In a forthcoming article on the subject,  Howell finds that, looking at NYPD crime statistics from every year  between 2005 and 2012, the amount of gang-motivated crime in fact only  accounts for less than 1% of total crime (close to 0.2% most years,  except for 2012 when it was 0.09%).

As  for shootings and homicide, the numbers are higher, but still vastly  below the 30% or one-third repeatedly advertised by former police  commissioner Ray Kelly and current police commissioner, Bill Bratton.  Direct gang-related shooting and homicide incidents each mostly hovered  around 3% in respective categories over the eight-year period analyzed.  Gang-related homicides and shootings were considerably higher, but still  well below publicized numbers, ranging from representing 12% and 19% of  shootings, and between 15% and 20% of homicides.

According to NYPD charts from 2011 and 2012 where both categories are  included, domestic violence is between two and four times more likely  to be a cause for homicide than gangs are.

A recipe for injustice

Large cities like Detroit, Chicago, Washington DC and Los Angeles are  also experimenting with online social media monitoring, with children  as young as three sometimes being found on databases. The Detroit Crime  Commission has been seeking to develop algorithms able to cut through  millions of tweets to zoom in on those pointing to violent acts or  intent.

Desmond Patton, a social work professor at the University of  Michigan, says with the right kind of cooperation between law  enforcement and people in the know, such as violence interrupters,  online social media monitoring could be used to foresee and interrupt  violence, rather than just crack down on it.

But Jay Stanley at the ACLU says "wholesale mongering" – or watching  people on a mass scale, even when the monitored information is publicly  available – is an unacceptable practice.

"Yes, any police officer can read the New York Times, but we are not  paying our police officers to read the New York Times, we are not paying  police officers to monitor our social media streams," Stanley says.

"Our technology has created such a risk trail of information about  us. At a time where we are also seeing prosecutorial powers and  discretion expanding, and privacy protections being eroded. When those  three trends dovetail, it's a recipe for injustice."

'They know everything we do'
Mike Loudwy is sipping on a strawberry margarita at one of Harlem's  underground Mexican restaurants. He is comparing notes with his friend  about police treatment of black people in the area. The tone is  good-humored with a hint of the incensed.

"You can get caught being black on a Friday night and be thrown into  jail," Loudwy quips. Many of his friends are locked up, he says – some  for as little as being found with $30 worth of drugs on them. His dinner  companion, also a young black Harlem resident, starts counting off the  NYPD cameras installed in streets surrounding their homes. "I'm telling  you, they're watching us, man. They know everything we do."

While ordering some food, Loudwy confides the best way to deal with  police randomly stopping you is to stay silent and know your rights. "If  you start talking, they'll find a way to throw you in. Any wrong move  could be my life," he says. "You don't even have to let them search you.  They need a probable cause."

Loudwy says he learned about his rights by watching a series of  videos on YouTube. Technology is changing things, he explains, pointing  to the way in which Eric Garner's killing at the hands of police last  summer was filmed and widely shared online.

Is he on Facebook? "Hell no. I call Facebook 'fed-book'. I don't do Facebook. They're watching us on there."
 To some, his words may come across a little paranoid; the result of  growing up with cameras on the street corner, police watchtowers a few  blocks away; too many years being ordered to the ground by an  overzealous police force. Maybe a few too many Snowden-themed movies,  too.

And yet, Loudwy's fears hold up. What is perhaps most alarming is  that he and his friends are so used to being treated like suspects that  to find out that they are being watched online comes as no surprise.  Even without actual proof, it's something they have just assumed – quite  rightly – has been happening all along.

The NYPD was contacted for interview on this story, but declined to make anyone available.