kevin muhammed warns people about the dangers of vaccines-gctid34141

[kweku, afro olmec]

ROMERIKKKA CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL WARFARE AGAINST Kmtyw CHILDREN:flaming:

FROM AN EMAIL LIST, I GOT THIS MESSAGE!:hello:
Peace, Keith:

I do believe that it is very responsible to advise parents to reject all vaccines. No vaccines are good for us. There are no benefits to vaccination. NONE! There is much that I can say to support this—beginning with the fact that our natural immune systems are sufficient to protect us from injury by pathogens.

Let us consider the following ingredients of the Hepatitis B vaccines given to all newborns born in America: Genetically-engineered hepatitis B virus genes, Aluminum Hydroxyphosphate Sulfate, Amino Acids, Dextrose, Formaldehyde or Formalin, Mineral Salts, Potassium Aluminum Sulfate, Soy Peptone, Yeast Protein. How do these chemicals protect anyone from Hepatitis B infections, not to mention a baby who is only moments old? This is the root of my argument against vaccines—we must examine the chemicals in them. We cannot look at vaccines as a whole. We must know what chemicals make up vaccines and how each specific chemical affects our bodies.

In the HPV book, I dedicate an entire chapter to the dangers of aluminum to the brain and body which have been known for more than a century, yet this metal remains in vaccines for no justifiable reason, with respect to health.  I also cover how the genetically-engineering process used to produce vaccines are volatile and hazardous. There are other variables to consider, such as the evolutionary processes of pathogens and their ability to circumvent the immune system after they infect us.

Historically, in eurasia and Kmt, inoculations were for sick people to help direct the course of infection. This is a form of homeopathy. Healthy people were not inoculated. Why infect healthy people with disease-causing pathogens? Vaccination is the act of infecting healthy people with diseases. This is the eureurasiaan way, and it was done for diabolical purposes, not for good-will. Currently, there is an HIV vaccine in the pipeline. Would any one of us want to be infected with an HIV vaccine under the auspices of being protected against AIDS?

As for the so-called scientific evidence of the court ruling that sanctioned vaccination, much of this evidence came from the medical industry, which makes $1 trillion dollars annually on vaccines. Vaccines create the unhealthy population we now have. With that said, I reiterate the previous point. I comes down to science, and not conspiracies. How does formaldehyde, aluminum, and laboratory-made pathogens protect us from infectious diseases? What injuries do these chemicals cause to infants? Many! Some of these injuries appear later in life because vaccines have latent abilities. The arguments delivered by the court ruling did not dissect the ingredients of vaccines, and put each ingredient on trial as to the injuries they cause. This should have been done. I examined the court ruling, and it was very superficial and pathetic.

Again, my argument against vaccines is more extensive than what I just mentioned, although this may be enough. However, I only scratched the surface.

Finally, last year I sent my report on the dangers of HPV vaccines to state government legislatures who were about to make Gardasil mandatory for school-age girls. After reading this document, all of them retracted their decision. One state legislature thanked me for the research and said she had not read anything as comprehensive as the argument I presented against HPV vaccines. This is not a pat on my back. This suggests that people are not provided with information that is thorough enough to help them understand the "vaccination spectrum." This is all I am trying to do with my research.

I hope this helps.

Peace,
Kevin