The reality of lies: the role of empirical evidence is the establishment, maintenance and expansion of christianity-gctid47310

[Ɔbenfo Ọbádélé]

The role of empirical evidence is the establishment, maintenance and expansion of christianity in Kmt and in Kmtyws

I assume everyone here is aware that the story of the fictional cartoon character "jesus christ" is the plagiarized story of heru and the various "historical" aspects of the character's life are simply allegories for the movements of the sun. Similarly, religious concepts contained in christianity such as final judgment, commandments, etc are lifted wholesale from various Kemetic spiritial texts, most notably, Prt M Hrw, the book of coming forth by day.

With that understanding we know that christianity is based on lies (from the garden of eden where some original sin occurred to the coming of fictional christ to save people from their sins).

In Ghana, with the predominance of christianity, I find that people are less convinced by the easily-debunked foundation of lies and deception that is the theology of the religion as they are hypnotized with the reality that the lies are real not from a logical perspective, but from an empirical perspective. People are convinced that this must be real because those who accept the ill-concocted batch of bald-faced lies prosper financially, socially, etc. This is similar to ameripean doctrines of manifest destiny which basically went like "because I was successful at exterminating you people, it means I must have had a divine mandate to do so."

It also speaks to the reality that ameripeans reward those who betray truth, their race, their own self-interests, their Ancestors, etc in real and tangible ways. Therefore, no matter how obvious the lies are and no matter how psychologically deleterious worshipping a white man who was created by michaelangelo in the image of our oppressors, people are willing to accept it because of the reality of the empirical evidence. "If I go along with the program I get real and tangible rewards."
The ill-logic is like "the white man brought this shiny trinket/machine/gadget, so if I pray to this white god, I'll be rewarded with the shiny trash."

This begs the question of how do Kmtyws EMPIRICALLY counter the house of cards composed solely of jokers that is christianity. What tangible rewards can we/our Spiritual forces/our Ancestors offer Kmtyw people given our abject lack of physical/economic/military control and power? Essentially the battle for the souls of our people, like most things, comes down to who has the power to reward and/or punish in this realm (and/or the next).

Discuss.
Posted via Mobile Device

[asarhondo]

Late last night I set by my desk with the lights off and I tried to imagine Kmtyw Gods. The best I could do was think of statuestic Black figures with no names with heads raised up and straight backs. I then tried to think about people who I admired, those committed to black sovereignty and self respect. I thought of Shaka Zulu and Fredrick Douglas and then nothing else came to mind except a cartoonish "white" mans face, one wearing a white rob who was surrounded by clouds. The image was sparked by a happenstance glimpse of the "Simpsons" which I had seen earlier while I was flicking through the t.v. The "Simpson" episode was about  "God", and lo and behold, "God" was white, even in a cartoon where everyone is yellow.

I then started to think about this sick image of God embedded within my mind and its re-enforcement by the eureurasiaan media. It was partially due to my upbringing and training to be a Christian. Thus flashbacks of my childhood memories and beliefs are inevitable. Yet I supposedly know, now, that Christianity and Islam are political, as well as metaphysical tools that are used to unite a people and to subdue and lull those they have conquered. Thus, why is it so hard for me to break that bond? To the point which I need to remind myself that "The Catholic Church is a Jewish Freemasonry political movement founded in the Middle Ages (325AD) by Constantine." not Kmtyws .... Yet these images of a white god still infest my mind. Thus a solution to end this white god obsession is to not teach our youth these fables, since they are so hard to extract from ones mind even as we get older.

On the other hand, why have Black people continued the tradition of teaching and worshiping White, aAmw and even eurasian gods? The sad answer to the questions is fear. Black people have been trained to be cowards, have raise their children to be cowards, thus, our continuous obsession with White, aAmw and even eurasian gods. It is for the most part a sign of our great fear to fight and believe in ourselves and our own image. Indeed, if it were for the promise of material goods, I could reluctantly understand, but since so very few receive them, that can not be the case.

 The fear of death, the fear of not eating, the fear of not having a future, are the reasons for the apathy and since so many Blacks having given up on the tangible present, their hopes have been diverted towards an imaginary white heaven (eureurasia in the sky) that lies after their death;  with this in mind one can understand why Christianity has had such a grip on Kmt.

Ever since our disastrous loss of sovereignty thoroughout the planet but especially Kmt, it is hard to muster any Kmtyw to believe in a supreme being that has dark skin and a majestic comportment. We need to replace the white god with a Black. But with whom? Ma'at though sensible is a confusing story plus she does not look from my perspective like a dark black woman. I need to study this a little more, but I am to the point where I believe that I may have to create a supreme being story with a main character that is Blue Black and who holds high standards as to how he/she  and us should live on the planet.

[Agya Yaw]

When I first read this thread I wrote something, almost hit post then deleted it.
 
I can only answer this question through personal experience. I was fortunate in that I was not heavily indoctrinated with christian values growing up. Never was I mandated to go to church, never told to pray or had images of that eureurasiaan con game in my house. Of course I saw it eslewhere but not in my home (except t.v.). So when I came into the knowledge of our people it was very easy for me break away. Plus christianity never "worked" for me. The answers to questions I had about "God", "what happens when you die", "why do people call themselves a sinner at birth", "how did Jesus walk on water" seemed like complete B.S. in my youth.
 
We need to make knowledge of our history, people and culture as pervasive as christianity. We can't save everybody and there will always be casualties in this war for minds and souls. We counter it by putting forth our agenda and let folks see for themselves.
 
Arguing various points and opinions in my experience mostly gets one labelled of some sort of devil or agent of.
:gyenyame:

[Ɔbenfo Ọbádélé]

asarhondo;47314 wrote: Late last night I set by my desk with the lights off and I tried to imagine Kmtyw Gods. The best I could do was think of statuestic Black figures with no names with heads raised up and straight backs. I then tried to think about people who I admired, those committed to black sovereignty and self respect. I thought of Shaka Zulu and Fredrick Douglas and then nothing else came to mind except a cartoonish "white" mans face, one wearing a white rob who was surrounded by clouds. The image was sparked by a happenstance glimpse of the "Simpsons" which I had seen earlier while I was flicking through the t.v. The "Simpson" episode was about  "God", and lo and behold, "God" was white, even in a cartoon where everyone is yellow.

I then started to think about this sick image of God embedded within my mind and its re-enforcement by the eureurasiaan media. It was partially due to my upbringing and training to be a Christian. Thus flashbacks of my childhood memories and beliefs are inevitable. Yet I supposedly know, now, that Christianity and Islam are political, as well as metaphysical tools that are used to unite a people and to subdue and lull those they have conquered. Thus, why is it so hard for me to break that bond? To the point which I need to remind myself that "The Catholic Church is a Jewish Freemasonry political movement founded in the Middle Ages (325AD) by Constantine." not Kmtyws .... Yet these images of a white god still infest my mind. Thus a solution to end this white god obsession is to not teach our youth these fables, since they are so hard to extract from ones mind even as we get older.

On the other hand, why have Black people continued the tradition of teaching and worshiping White, aAmw and even eurasian gods? The sad answer to the questions is fear. Black people have been trained to be cowards, have raise their children to be cowards, thus, our continuous obsession with White, aAmw and even eurasian gods. It is for the most part a sign of our great fear to fight and believe in ourselves and our own image. Indeed, if it were for the promise of material goods, I could reluctantly understand, but since so very few receive them, that can not be the case.

 The fear of death, the fear of not eating, the fear of not having a future, are the reasons for the apathy and since so many Blacks having given up on the tangible present, their hopes have been diverted towards an imaginary white heaven (eureurasia in the sky) that lies after their death;  with this in mind one can understand why Christianity has had such a grip on Kmt.

Ever since our disastrous loss of sovereignty thoroughout the planet but especially Kmt, it is hard to muster any Kmtyw to believe in a supreme being that has dark skin and a majestic comportment. We need to replace the white god with a Black. But with whom? Ma'at though sensible is a confusing story plus she does not look from my perspective like a dark black woman. I need to study this a little more, but I am to the point where I believe that I may have to create a supreme being story with a main character that is Blue Black and who holds high standards as to how he/she  and us should live on the planet.

This is a serious task of dewhitenization. Assassinating God. Who's ready to pull the trigger?

[Ɔbenfo Ọbádélé]

?errthang;47317 wrote: Truth should be its' own reward. Why should/would we have to reward people for following truth? If you reward people for doing right, you should be suspect that they are only doing right for the reward and not because it is right.
 
Sheeple follow religion because it's easy and it makes them accountable only to the parts of the doctrine(s) that they choose to follow (most christians don't follow all their 10 commandments--which is only a pick and parcel of the principles of Ma'at and catholics believe that confession absolves them of their sins that they commit although they still continue to commit them). It takes strength and courage to do what is righteous and just.
 
An argument I use is that krakkaz don't even believe in the god that they've pushed on everyone else. If they truly believed, they would be fearful of that god from all they have done/do throughout time. No one can seriously believe in a god that is all-knowing/all-seeing/all-powerful and continue to steal, kill, and destroy (attributes of the enemy as described in the bible) all of that god's creations.
 
And yet, krakkaz want US to forgive and forget (most times citing their lord's prayer--original Aramaic version below doesn't even have the word forgive in it).

Truth should be its own reward, however, for many food, clothes and  shelter plus shiny trash trumps truth. For Kmtyws, particularly on the  continent, christianity is only skin-deep. As soon as they stop seeing  "results" from following the big eureurasian beast in the sky, they'll  stop. In the meantime, they see it like as long as I follow this  floating caveman I get status, wealth, mates, etc. Truth is not in  christianity; it's a pack of hastily cut and pasted lies. but the  empirical evidence of what they receive from following it is also a  truth they are taking into account. The ability to give these things  springs from christianity as a political tool of gangsters who used it  as a weapon to subjugate. For many, that's also a truth on par with  manifest destiny: like if it wasn't effective/correct/right to follow,  they wouldn't have "won". Thus, when they're defeated completely at some  point in the future, that takes away the empirical evidence. The  challenge is for those who have been infected to the bone who the more  they are defeated, the more they'll cling to it.

[Ɔbenfo Ọbádélé]

Yaw Asare Aboagye;47318 wrote: When I first read this thread I wrote something, almost hit post then deleted it.
 
I can only answer this question through personal experience. I was fortunate in that I was not heavily indoctrinated with christian values growing up. Never was I mandated to go to church, never told to pray or had images of that eureurasiaan con game in my house. Of course I saw it eslewhere but not in my home (except t.v.). So when I came into the knowledge of our people it was very easy for me break away. Plus christianity never "worked" for me. The answers to questions I had about "God", "what happens when you die", "why do people call themselves a sinner at birth", "how did Jesus walk on water" seemed like complete B.S. in my youth.
 
We need to make knowledge of our history, people and culture as pervasive as christianity. We can't save everybody and there will always be casualties in this war for minds and souls. We counter it by putting forth our agenda and let folks see for themselves.
 
Arguing various points and opinions in my experience mostly gets one labelled of some sort of devil or agent of.
:gyenyame:

I think those it doesn't work for, those with the least tie to it, are the most likely to leave it for something else. The second point is when they move to something else, hopefully something Kmtyw, what is there to sustain spritually, physically and otherwise.

[asarhondo]

Obadele Kambon;49416 wrote: For many, that's also a truth on par with  manifest destiny: like if it wasn't effective/correct/right to follow,  they wouldn't have "won". Thus, when they're defeated completely at some  point in the future, that takes away the empirical evidence. The  challenge is for those who have been infected to the bone who the more  they are defeated, the more they'll cling to it.

Very well said!