What was Israel in relation to Kmtyw people?-gctid216823

[Motingwa Motingwa]

Ok. This is not hard evidence and 70 B.C. doesn't come anywhere close to the time of the Nesut Bity (pharaoh) mentioned above. Even the said legends that say there were Jews in Maroc by 586 B.C. isn't as far back. I just think this information is angle by which to become part of a conversation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94CWcNmoyZ4

[Kwadwo Tòkunbọ̀]

Lion-O;235870 wrote: Ok. This is not hard evidence and 70 B.C. doesn't come anywhere close to the time of the Nesut Bity (pharaoh) mentioned above. Even the said legends that say there were Jews in Maroc by 586 B.C. isn't as far back. I just think this information is angle by which to become part of a conversation.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=94CWcNmoyZ4

What is this? Evidence of what?

------------------------------------------
Power is the ability to define reality and to have other people respond to your definition as if it were their own. - Dr. Wade Nobles

[Motingwa Motingwa]

It's more of a reply to What is Israel in Relation to Kmt or Kmtyw people. What someone says, not necessarily what I believe. I think we are all seeking truth. There are those who claim the Exodus in the Bible was a prophecy referring to a return of our people from the west (Egypt) and that Black people in the diaspora through slavery make up two lost tribes of Israel; Ephraim and Judah..

[Kwadwo Tòkunbọ̀]

Lion-O;235873 wrote: It's more of a reply to What is Israel in Relation to Kmt or Kmtyw people. What someone says, not necessarily what I believe. I think we are all seeking truth. There are those who claim the Exodus in the Bible was a prophecy referring to a return of our people from the west (Egypt) and that Black people in the diaspora through slavery make up two lost tribes of Israel; Ephraim and Judah..

Ok got you.  This discussion has been had here for a while.   I have had it offline as well.   The thing is we have to start to move more toward primary sources that our ancestors left for us to read and study then we rely on religious literature which is 50% lies and 50% myths that seem for some to be taken as literal authoritative documents over historical records.  Our ancestors left us the evidence carved in stone to read, there are real life accounts of real life people and events that can be studied as primary evidence.  Then to extend the research there are linguistics and other disciplines that can be used to further unravel the history.  This is the primary approach that Chiek Anta Diop and Theophile Obenga used at the 1974 UNESCO conference and similar to today because the other so called scholars were no prepared using primary resources and a multi-discipline approach the conference was halted.  I find basically on a smaller scale the same issue when entering into a discussion on this topic or any religious topic for that matter. Once we move away from religious literature and focus on primary evidence this is where we get the lack of serious scholarship approach.   When this happens I am learning to just leave it where it is.  

This is my experience.

------------------------------------------
Power is the ability to define reality and to have other people respond to your definition as if it were their own. - Dr. Wade Nobles

[Agya Yaw]

I don't speak with anyone who's religious about their stories/myth/folktales, I find it futile. If they say I'm going to hell then I say, "I'm gonna burn baby burn."

[Kwadwo Tòkunbọ̀]

Agya Yaw;235876 wrote: I don't speak with anyone who's religious about their stories/myth/folktales, I find it futile. If they say I'm going to hell then I say, "I'm gonna burn baby burn."

Basically

------------------------------------------
Power is the ability to define reality and to have other people respond to your definition as if it were their own. - Dr. Wade Nobles

[Obibini]

Agya Yaw;235876 wrote: I don't speak with anyone who's religious about their stories/myth/folktales, I find it futile. If they say I'm going to hell then I say, "I'm gonna burn baby burn."

The best answer I have for those who say non religious people are going to "Hell" is: I do not accept the idea of going to "hell" from those who have never been there before.
And that shuts them up!!

KNOWing is better than beLIEving.