Sponsored Community Message Browse Free. Go deeper with Full Access. Free visitors can browse public knowledge. Full Access unlocks participation, member areas, and an ad-free experience.

How easy it is to hack a phone-gctid43927

Started by Ajamu, Jul 09, 2011, 06:26 PM

Previous topic - Next topic
.


Kevin Mitnick shows how easy it is to hack a phone

Kevin Mitnick shows how easy it is to hack a phone | InSecurity Complex - CNET News

by Elinor Mills

(Credit: Declan McCullagh/CNET)

British tabloid News of the World said today  it is closing down over a phone hacking scandal in which workers for  the Rupert Murdoch-owned newspaper allegedly snooped on voice mail  messages left on the mobile phones of murder victims, as well as  celebrities, politicians, and the British royal family.

If unethical journalists can do it chances are anyone can, right?

To test my theory I called up Kevin Mitnick,  who wrote about the hacking and social engineering that landed him in  jail in a fascinating book coming out this summer, "Ghost in the Wires,"  and who serves as a security consultant, helping clients protect  against privacy breaches such as this.

 Phone hacking, also known  as "phreaking," is easy to do, Mitnick said, adding that he could  demonstrate it on my phone if I wanted proof. So I gave him permission  to access my voice mail and told him my mobile phone number.

He  called me right back on a conference call so I could hear what was going  on. First he dialed a number to a system he uses for such demonstration  purposes and entered a PIN. Then he was prompted to enter the area code  and phone number that he wanted to call (mine) and the number he wanted  to be identified as calling from (again mine). Next thing I know I'm  listening to a voice message a friend of mine left me last night that I  hadn't erased.

"See how easy it is?!" Mitnick says as my jaw drops.

He was able to get into my voice mail by tricking my mobile operator's  equipment into registering the call as coming from the  handset--basically pretending to be me. To do this, he wrote a script  using open-source telecom software and used a voice-over-IP provider  that allows him to set caller ID, but there also are online services  that provide similar capability that non-hackers could subscribe to. It  might be easier or harder to accomplish depending on the mobile  operator, he said. (I'm keeping some of the details sketchy to avoid  providing a how-to for phreaking.)

 "Any 15-year-old that knows  how to write a simple script can find a VoIP provider that spoofs caller  ID and set this up in about 30 minutes," Mitnick said. "If you're not  adept at programming, you could use a spoofing service and pay for it."

This technique, called Caller ID Spoofing, has been used and abused for  years. In 2006, a caller ID spoofing account in the name of Paris  Hilton was suspended for voicemail hacking, with other celebrities,  including Lindsay Lohan, allegedly being victims, according to IDG News Service.

  The method is more sophisticated than that allegedly used by the  British journalists who are accused of using default PINs to access  victims' voicemail accounts, assuming correctly that many people  wouldn't bother to change the PINs. Since the phone hacking scandal  first erupted about five years ago, mobile operators in the U.K. have  changed their practices and most now require people to set their own  PINs for remotely checking voice mail.

If I want to avoid having  anyone use Caller ID Spoofing to access my voice mail again, I need to  change my phone settings to require a PIN even when checking voice mail  from my mobile device. But that doesn't address the fact that mobile  operators don't authenticate caller ID. "The magic is that my VoIP  provider allows me to set any caller ID and the other operators trust  it," Mitnick said. "Caller ID is automatically trusted."

 Mobile phone industry specialist David Rogers suggests on his blog that operators should consider preventing people from accessing mobile voicemails remotely at all.

Meanwhile, the Truth in Caller ID Act of 2010, which was signed into  law late last year, prohibits anyone intending to defraud, cause harm,  or wrongfully obtain anything of value from knowingly causing any caller  ID service to transmit or display misleading or inaccurate caller ID  information. This could send the caller spoofing services off shore but  likely won't put an end to the practice.

Read more: Kevin Mitnick shows how easy it is to hack a phone | InSecurity Complex - CNET News

.